|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Special Education Teachers; Public School Teachers; Teacher Supply and Demand; Economic Climate; Declining Enrollment; Special Needs Students; Disabilities; Early Intervention; Response to Intervention; Special Education; Educational Finance; Faculty Mobility; Outcomes of Education; Teacher Education; Teacher Distribution; Teacher Shortage; Teacher Persistence
Abstract:
After decades of growth, the number of special education teachers (SETs) has begun to decline. In 2009, U.S. schools employed 13% fewer SETs than in 2006. The number of annual new hires of SETs also dropped dramatically in some states. The onset of these declines predated the economic downturn of 2008 and resulted in part from a steady decline since 2005 in the number of students with disabilities (SWD) served. We consider factors that may be contributing to declining demand for SETs, among them the number of SWD, service delivery, the economic downturn, and present supporting evidence. We also consider the potential impact of reduced demand on SET supply, teacher education, equitable distribution of teachers, and, most importantly, outcomes for SWD. We call for vigilance and monitoring of SET employment data to assure that all students receive the appropriate education to which they are entitled. (Contains 4 figures, 1 table, and 6 footnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
College Faculty; Careers; School Psychology; Graduate Students; School Psychologists; Higher Education; Teacher Shortage; Tenure; Faculty; Graduate School Faculty; Nontenured Faculty; Teaching (Occupation); Adjunct Faculty
Abstract:
Faculty shortage is a major concern for the field of school psychology in the United States. Graduate students are not entering the field at a rate representative of the current need (Clopton & Haselhuhn, 2009). The reasons for this are multifaceted, but some studies have pointed to perceived high levels of job stress, perceived inadequate preparation to assume an academic position, and perceived low salary as possible deterrents to entering academia (Nagle, Suldo, Christenson, & Hansen, 2004). Faculty roles, duties, and expectations can vary substantially by institution type, location, program type, and college and department culture. Students may only be relatively knowledgeable of the types of positions they see in their own graduate program, which may be extremely limited in scope relative to the types of faculty positions available in school psychology. Unfortunately, students' opportunities to learn about this career path are often limited. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to provide readers interested in careers in academia an overview of the various faculty roles one might enter and an understanding of why professors in the field have entered these roles. Some researchers have suggested that if graduate students were more aware of the types of faculty roles available to doctoral level school psychologists, the faculty shortage might be reduced (Clopton & Haselhuhn, 2009). In this article, the authors provide an overview of the roles available to trainers in school psychology.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-12-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Profiles; Science Teachers; Middle Schools; Mathematics Teachers; Course Selection (Students); Masters Degrees; Graduate Study; Elementary School Teachers; Science Instruction; Mathematics Instruction; Surveys; Teacher Attitudes; Career Change; Teacher Shortage; STEM Education
Abstract:
The nation's middle schools suffer from a shortage of qualified science and mathematics teachers. To address this need, one university in the southwest has developed the Modeling Institute, a master's degree program for in-service elementary educators interested in teaching science and mathematics at the middle school level. Identifying the profile of teachers interested in pursuing additional coursework in science and mathematics is necessary to more effectively attract candidates and to better facilitate the program. Thus, we administered an online survey to in-service teachers to uncover needs and influencing factors. Data revealed that the majority (60%) of 324 in-service teachers are interested in pursuing additional education, beyond that reflected on their current transcript, as a route to becoming more competent in teaching and integrating science and mathematics. The present study provides a plausible profile of K-8 certified teachers interested in pursuing a master's degree program or postbaccalaureate coursework to achieve content expertise in science and mathematics. Such a profile can assist universities in designing math- and science-related programs that meet the needs of in-service teachers and districts they serve by increasing the number of teachers who are qualified (by transcript and test scores) and competent in their content. (Contains 7 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Buchanan, John |
Source: |
Australian Journal of Education, v56 n2 p205-217 Aug 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-08-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Classroom Techniques; Teacher Persistence; Faculty Mobility; Teaching (Occupation); Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Faculty Workload; Faculty Development; Teacher Attitudes; Self Esteem; Teacher Recruitment; Work Environment; Teacher Shortage; Interviews; Occupational Aspiration; Goal Orientation; Foreign Countries
Abstract:
Teacher attrition is a cost to the community and, often, to the teachers concerned. One ready potential source of teachers is those having left the profession, particularly recently, and who may be willing to return. For this article, 22 former teachers were interviewed about their journey into and out of teaching. Understanding what made teachers leave may inform us on what it might take to get them back. This paper reports on these former teachers' professional intentions in light of their changing constructs of teaching through time, comparing, where possible, their former and current constructs of teaching and of their teacher-selves. The study constitutes a series of "before and after" pictures, providing stark contrast at times. The findings generate theory on factors leading to these changes. One emerging inference is that the teaching profession fails to apply some of its corporate pedagogical knowledge to its own newcomers.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Tenzer, Laurie |
Source: |
Online Submission, Ed.D. Dissertation, Argosy University |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-11-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations; Tests/Questionnaires |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Higher Education; College Faculty; Adjunct Faculty; Faculty; Teacher Shortage; Proprietary Schools; Teacher Motivation; Incentives; Teaching Conditions; Flexible Scheduling; Educational Opportunities; Research Methodology; Job Security; Online Courses; Faculty Development
Abstract:
A shortage of qualified online faculty exists as learner demand rises. This replication research studied two sample populations--full-time and adjunct--of online faculty at a for-profit applied arts college. The purpose of this study was to discover the motivators and incentives that drive faculty to teach online, enabling college-level administrators to make decisions targeted at retaining and hiring a qualified online teaching pool. Using descriptive and inferential statistics the study explored four research questions about the motivators and incentives of two current online populations. The findings showed flexible schedule to be the top motivator for both populations. Additionally, adjuncts were motivated by job concerns. Passing on experiential knowledge and the ability to balance work and family motivated full-timers. Higher pay and professional development opportunities were the top incentives for both sample populations. Full-timers were also concerned with job security. It was concluded that ensuring a flexible schedule and higher pay are two areas that administrators should focus on in order to attract and retain top online teaching talent. Questions remain as to whether the results were universally dependent upon subject matter taught (i.e., art, career, liberal arts, engineering courses) or the type of institution (i.e., public, non-profit, for-profit). Would the results have been different had the study been conducted during a stable era at the institution? A replication of this study at the same institution at a future date would answer this question. A study at a different 100% online college would help further elucidate the findings. Six appendixes present: (1) Informed Consent Letter to Participate in Online Survey; (2) Permission to Use Survey Instrument; (3) Survey Instrument; (4) Institutional Consent; (5) Email Contact to Participants' Supervisor; and (6) Email Contact to Participants. (Contains 4 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (588K)
|
|