Author(s): |
McLester, Susan |
Source: |
District Administration, v48 n10 p36-41 Nov 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-11-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Teaching Methods; Feedback (Response); Educational Change; Best Practices; Faculty Development; Sustainability; Risk; Teacher Collaboration; Program Effectiveness; Administrator Role; School Culture; Teacher Empowerment
Abstract:
Although best practices in student instruction and learning have evolved dramatically over the past couple of decades, new approaches to educator professional development have lagged behind considerably. The traditional whole group, one-size-fits-all strategy universally recognized as ineffective for teaching students, has too-long remained the status quo for many school and districts leaders. Recent reports such as the 2009 "Professional Learning in the Learning Profession," by the National Staff Development Council and the School Redesign Network at Stanford University affirm a direct link between highly effective, sustained professional development and differentiated approaches to teacher training, collegial collaboration, and risk taking. Risk-taking includes embracing new teaching methods like the integration of online Khan Academy tutorials into a math class, and requesting feedback from students and parents on how it is working. Risk-taking also includes a higher level of transparency, such as sharing classroom practices that did not work, as well as those that did, at a Parent Teacher Student Association meeting, or via a school newsletter or classroom website. Establishing and maintaining a culture of ongoing learning is the core principle underlying sustainability. Creating a culture that is excited about learning is the strongest foundation for best practices in schools. Ensuring that administrators are deeply immersed in and dedicated to the school's professional development program is key to its effectiveness and sustainability.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Xu, Yuejin; Patmor, George |
Source: |
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, v24 n2 p252-256 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Strategies; Educational Change; Leadership Training; Teacher Leadership; Preservice Teachers; Teacher Empowerment; Faculty Development; Teaching Methods; Teacher Education Programs
Abstract:
Teacher leadership is about empowering teachers to take a more active role in school improvement. Current pathways to teacher leadership, namely the Teacher Leader Master (TLM) degree program and teacher-led professional development, mainly target in-service teachers. Less attention has been paid to teacher leadership training in current teacher preparation curricula. This article describes three instructional strategies for nurturing pre-service teachers' leadership skills in a teacher preparation program. The three strategies are (1) to encourage cross-domain and multiple perspective-taking among pre-service teachers; (2) to enhance pre-service teachers' ethical reasoning; and (3) to engage pre-service teachers in analyzing real-life teacher leadership cases. The specific strategies presented in this article can be used as examples for teacher preparation programs as they strengthen their efforts in leadership training for pre-service teachers.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (44K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Teaching Methods; Preservice Teacher Education; Theaters; Reflective Teaching; Field Experience Programs; Literacy; Methods Courses; Reflection; Teacher Empowerment; Performance Based Assessment; Dramatics; Portfolio Assessment; Mentors
Abstract:
During a teaching methods field experience, we initiated several processes to facilitate pre-service teachers' reflection, empowerment, and performance as they learned to teach students. Through an ethno-theater presentation and subsequent revisions to an ethno-theater script, we turned the reflective lens on ourselves as we discovered instances of our teaching within this field experience that required us to look at our data and ourselves as contributing actors in a series of scenes. Our analysis of the data (as captured through the performance text) led us to new understandings of "reflection," "empowerment," and "performance" through the constructed roles and relationships within this field experience work. We discuss the process of creating an ethno-theater script and the methodological impact it had on us as teacher educators and researchers. We conclude with a proposal for dramatic solutions to accelerating reflexivity within teacher education contexts. (Contains 3 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Chemistry; Secondary School Science; Secondary School Teachers; Science Teachers; Teacher Empowerment; Faculty Development; Instructional Design; Relevance (Education); Program Effectiveness; Foreign Countries
Abstract:
Even experienced chemistry teachers require professional development when they are encouraged to become actively engaged in the design of new context-based education. This study briefly describes the development of a framework consisting of goals, learning phases, strategies and instructional functions, and how the framework was translated into a professional development programme intended to empower teachers to design context-based chemistry education. The programme consists of teaching a pre-developed context-based unit, followed by teachers designing an outline of a new context-based unit. The study investigates the process of teacher empowerment during the implementation of the programme. Data were obtained from meetings, classroom discussions and observations. The findings indicated that teachers became empowered to design new context-based units provided they had sufficient time and resources. The contribution of the framework to teacher empowerment is discussed. (Contains 1 figure, 4 tables and 1 note.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Pring, Richard |
Source: |
British Journal of Educational Studies, v60 n1 p29-38 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Opinion Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Change; Government Role; Public Service; Local Government; Role Perception; Educational History; Intellectual History; Educational Development; Partnerships in Education; School Councils; Teacher Empowerment; Politics of Education; Administrative Policy; Administrative Principles; Administrative Organization; Foreign Countries
Abstract:
In this article, the author reflects on key events and issues with which he has been involved for 50 years. First, he gives a brief account of the Schools Council--what it meant in terms of the limited role of government in governing education, and in terms of the role of teachers as curriculum thinkers, not deliverers. Its demise in the 1980s coincided (necessarily) with a more centralised educational service. But that earlier, more subservient role of government gave rise to some of the most significant educational reports ever written which covered the whole expanse of education and training. Second, he briefly notes, in what was called "the great debate", the battles of ideas which took place in the 1970s over the content and aims of education, and the felt need of government to change the partnership between central and local government and the teachers. Third, that of course was made possible through not only the increased central accountability of the teachers, but also the gradual demise of local government and responsibility. There is now little between the schools and the Secretary of State. Fourth, he illustrates how far that partnership has been transformed, indeed to the point of disappearance. Fifth, the author looks to the future. Such a future is no doubt reflected through the nostalgic spectacles of the past, but that past embodied the ideal of local responsibility and accountability for education and of public service. It rightly in his view was built on a fear of an all-powerful government without the counterbalancing forces of local control. And it saw the centrality of a teaching profession which was not beholden to political masters in the content and methods of teaching. They, the teachers, should be the thinkers, not the deliverers.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|