|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Teacher Effectiveness; Accountability; Program Effectiveness; Stakeholders; Performance Based Assessment; Teacher Education; Teacher Education Programs; Graduates; Educational Change; Politics of Education; Educational Policy; Policy Analysis; Outcomes of Education; College Outcomes Assessment; Position Papers; College Programs; Curriculum Evaluation; Teacher Education Curriculum; Influences; Best Practices
Abstract:
Currently there are multiple teacher education reform policies being proposed, piloted, and debated at a variety of levels and by various interest groups, stakeholders, and policy-makers. Along with an unprecedented sense of urgency about these important goals, what most U.S. reforms have in common is increased accountability. Using a discourse approach to policy analysis, which we label "the politics of policy," this article analyzes three complicated and evolving contemporary accountability initiatives in the United States: (1) "Our Future, Our Teachers," which is the Obama administration's proposed blueprint for the reform of teacher education programs, in particular its call for the assessment of preparation programs based on the impact of program graduates on their eventual K-12 students' test scores; (2) the "Teacher Performance Assessment," which is a nationally accessible instrument for assessing beginning teaching performance currently being piloted in 25 states through a partnership of Stanford University and Pearson Education, Inc.; and, (3) "Building Better Teachers: A National Review of Teacher Preparation Programs," which is an evaluation of collegiate teacher preparation programs conducted by the National Council on Teacher Quality with results to appear in "U.S. News and World Report." Our analysis makes clear that policy (and policy proposals) is unavoidably political, and that policy-making involves contentious debate as well as complicated political maneuvering and strategies, including resistance and litigation. (Contains 1 figure.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-03-10 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Research; Tests/Questionnaires |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Qualitative Research; Preservice Teachers; Personality; Teacher Characteristics; Focus Groups; Self Efficacy; Professional Autonomy; Reflection; Teacher Education Curriculum; Teacher Educators; Early Childhood Education; Learning Theories
Abstract:
The intent of this qualitative study was to examine pre-service teachers' growing awareness of the role dispositions and autonomy play in the classroom and the implications these constructs have for teaching and learning. Teacher candidates' written reflections and focus group statements revealed three robust emergent themes: engagement, empowerment, and meaning making. When taking a wide lens view, these robust emergent themes nurtured certain dispositions, autonomy, and teaching efficacy. Teaching strategies such as the project approach (adult-oriented and with children) and the construction of math games were considered valuable assignments that strengthened a variety of dispositions by providing on-going opportunities for teacher candidates to engage in experiences that promoted autonomous thinking and actions during their preparation program. Teaching efficacy emerged as a related construct and became an integral component of this study. As teacher educators help pre-service teachers wrap their minds around the sometimes illusive dispositions construct, this study suggests that autonomy and efficacy should be included in this effort. In so doing, these constructs provide a meaningful foundation upon which teacher candidates can build and apply teaching and learning theories. Focus Group Interview Questions are appended. (Contains 5 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (112K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-02-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Science Education; Inquiry; Learning Activities; Educational Research; Barriers; Teaching Methods; Science Teachers; Teacher Educators; Problems; Teacher Characteristics; Theory Practice Relationship; Teacher Education Curriculum; Instructional Design
Abstract:
A central concern in science education is promoting inquiry activities, and a significant amount of research in science education has addressed what inhibits this goal. However, this research has tended to be focused on implementation issues. Levels of implementation are correlated with extrinsic barriers such as time, resources and teacher knowledge, but the internal structure of inquiry remains unexamined. However, are there also some ways in which inquiry based instruction is intrinsically difficult? That is, given perfect conditions for implementation, is devising inquiry activities a non-trivial matter, and are there patterns to the difficulties in doing so? The aim of this paper is to provide both a theoretical and empirical basis for the intrinsic problems associated with the construction of inquiry activities. We present a theoretical framework that connects contemporary studies of science to the classroom context. We then examine a case study of teacher education students designing inquiry-based instruction to demonstrate empirical evidence of intrinsic problems. Our ultimate goal is to improve our ability as teacher educators to guide science teachers in fulfilling this central task of their work.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
FPG Child Development Institute |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-02-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Disabilities; Preschool Teachers; Early Childhood Education; Young Children; Mathematics Education; Teacher Education Curriculum; Research Needs; Educational Needs; Preservice Teacher Education; Educational Research; Outcome Measures; Evidence; Research Reports
Abstract:
Public awareness of the value of a high quality early childhood education has never been stronger with Nobel-prize winning economist James J. Heckman declaring that it is the key to the nation's future. Higher education's role in preparing teachers to deliver on that promise is significant and continues to grow. A special issue of the "Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education" addresses this critically important question: For whom and in what ways does early childhood teacher education (ECTE) matter? The authors explore this issue by focusing on three domains of ECTE: (1) addressing the needs of young children with disabilities and their families; (2) understanding and working effectively with infants and toddlers; and, (3) building young children's competence and interest in mathematics. Each domain is critically important in the preparation of tomorrow's early childhood teachers; each has often been under-emphasized in ECTE programs; and, research in each has been inadequate. (Contains 1 resource.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (524K)
|
|