|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-02-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Science Education; Mathematics Education; National Surveys; Mathematics Teachers; Science Teachers; Best Practices; Teacher Attitudes; Influences; Factor Analysis; Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Teacher Background; Teacher Characteristics; Teaching Experience; Faculty Development; Textbooks; Instructional Materials; Educational Technology; Evidence; Educational Research; Science Instruction; Mathematics Instruction; Science Achievement; Mathematics Achievement; Questionnaires; Data Collection; Elementary Secondary Education
Abstract:
The 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education was designed to provide up-to-date information and to identify trends in the areas of teacher background and experience, curriculum and instruction, and the availability and use of instructional resources. A total of 7,752 science and mathematics teachers in schools across the United States participated in this survey. The research questions addressed by the survey are: (1) To what extent do science and mathematics instruction and ongoing assessment mirror current understanding of learning?; (2) What influences teachers' decisions about content and pedagogy?; (3) What are the characteristics of the science/mathematics teaching force in terms of race, gender, age, content background, beliefs about teaching and learning, and perceptions of preparedness?; (4) What are the most commonly used textbooks/programs, and how are they used?; (5) What formal and informal opportunities do science/mathematics teachers have for ongoing development of their knowledge and skills?; and (6) How are resources for science/mathematics education, including well-prepared teachers and course offerings, distributed among schools in different types of communities and different socioeconomic levels? The design and implementation of the 2012 National Survey involved developing a sampling strategy and selecting samples of schools and teachers, developing and piloting survey instruments, collecting data from sample members, and preparing data files and analyzing the data. These activities are described in this paper. This report of the 2012 National Survey is organized into major topical areas. In most cases, results are presented for groups of teachers categorized by grade level--elementary, middle, and high. In addition, factor analysis was used to create several composite variables related to key constructs measured on the questionnaires. Composite variables, which are more reliable than individual survey items, were computed to have a minimum possible value of 0 and a maximum possible value of 100. Appended are: (1) Sample Design; (2) Survey Questionnaires; (3) Pre-Data Collection Communication; (4) Description of Data Collection; (5) Description of Reporting Variables; and (6) Additional Equity Cross-tabulations. (Contains 55 figures, 236 tables, and 17 footnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (3528K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Teaching Experience; Mathematics Education; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematics Teachers; Teacher Education Curriculum; Teacher Educators; Elementary School Mathematics; Preservice Teacher Education; Elementary School Teachers; Teacher Background; Teacher Characteristics; Teacher Qualifications; National Surveys; School Surveys
Abstract:
This article reports on a national survey of higher education institutions in the United States to answer the question, "Who teaches mathematics content courses for prospective elementary teachers, and what are these instructors' academic and teaching backgrounds?" We surveyed 1,926 institutions, and a faculty member from each of 825 institutions (42.8 %) participated in the survey. The survey results demonstrate that the majority of institutions are not meeting the recommendations of the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (The mathematical education of teachers. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, "2001"), the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Professional standards for teaching mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, "2005"), and the National Council on Teacher Quality (Greenberg and Walsh "2008") for prospective elementary teachers to take at least nine credits of mathematics content designed specifically for them. Additionally, most instructors for these courses do not have elementary teaching experience and have likely not had opportunities to think deeply about the important ideas in elementary mathematics, and most institutions do not provide training and/or support for these instructors.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-08-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Student Evaluation; Formative Evaluation; Focus Groups; Genetics; Science Teachers; Teacher Background; Middle School Teachers; Data Analysis; Prediction; Questionnaires; Video Technology; Professional Development; Models; Educational Strategies; Science Instruction
Abstract:
Using a framework of assessment literacy that included teachers' view of learning, knowledge of assessment tools, and knowledge of assessment interpretation and action taking, this study explored the assessment literacy of five experienced middle school teachers. Multiple sources of data were: teachers' predictions about students' ideas, students' written and verbal responses to assessment tasks, teacher background questionnaire, and a videotaped teacher focus group. We investigated middle school teachers' predictions, interpretations, and recommended actions for formative assessment in genetics. Results documented a variety of ways that teachers would elicit students' ideas in genetics, focusing on discussion strategies. Findings showed how well teachers predicted student conceptions compared to actual student conceptions. We also found that teachers mostly described general topics they would use to address students' alternative conceptions. Less often, they explained specific content they would use to challenge ideas or pedagogical strategies for conceptual change. Teachers also discussed barriers to addressing ideas. Teacher professional development should provide more support in helping teachers close the formative assessment cycle by addressing conceptions that are elicited with assessments.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Beginning Teacher Induction; Mentors; Beginning Teachers; Teacher Persistence; Academic Achievement; Correlation; Program Effectiveness; Context Effect; Teacher Background; Teaching Experience; Elementary School Teachers; Teacher Surveys; Program Implementation; Comparative Analysis; Help Seeking; Helping Relationship; Classroom Techniques
Abstract:
Districts nationwide are implementing teacher induction programs as a strategy to increase both beginning teacher retention and student achievement. The induction of beginning teachers has been widely acknowledged as important for teachers' feelings of success and their retention (Darling-Hammond, 1994; Huling-Austin, 1989; Smylie, 1994). Mentoring is only one facet of a successful induction program, but it is the most common component of induction across districts (Fideler & Haselkorn, 1999; National Foundation for the Improvement of Education, 1999; Scherer, 1999). This chapter investigates the implementation of a mentoring program in New York City to explore its effectiveness in meeting the needs of beginning teachers. The authors seek to understand the extent to which new teachers perceived their mentor as helpful, how much time teachers spent with mentors, and what topics were addressed during mentoring. Furthermore, they analyze how these three elements differ by the background characteristics and experiences of the teachers, by school context, and by attributes of mentor assignment. (Contains 4 tables, 3 figures, and 9 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|