|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative; Tests/Questionnaires |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Evaluation Utilization; Institutional Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Stakeholders; Educational Planning; Self Evaluation (Groups); Technical Institutes; Governance; Community Colleges; Administrative Organization; Organizational Effectiveness; Case Studies; Improvement Programs; Coordination; Statewide Planning; Governing Boards; Educational Policy; Educational Finance; Public Agencies; Systems Approach; Strategic Planning; Politics of Education; Educational Environment; Policy Formation; Institutional Mission; Economic Factors; Questionnaires; Agency Role
Abstract:
Public organizations charged with coordinating higher education institutions face a complex set of tasks. Whether coordinating institutions within one sector or across sectors, such organizations play vital roles in promoting a state's capacity for policy leadership to meet the growing need for an educated citizenry. National experts have emphasized that effective policy capacity requires coordinating entities that can articulate mission and goals, devise strategies for meeting them, and use resources, including relationships with state leaders, to influence policy. The authors' case study subject, the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, was selected because of its track record of focusing a diverse constituency on a valuable public mission and using its resources strategically to facilitate large-scale policy changes aimed at making progress toward the mission. Its effectiveness rests in large part on its continual attention to relationships in order to mediate and balance the needs of various state and local parties. For states interested in improving existing coordinating organizations or designing new ones, the authors suggest that an assessment of the current context can illuminate possibilities for improvement. Multiple factors interact to create forward momentum and can be leveraged in myriad ways. Thus, the self assessment questions are designed so states can more clearly understand the factors at play in their own situations and more strategically evaluate short-term and long-term opportunities. The self-assessment questions fall into three categories: the state political and economic context, the design of the coordinating body itself, and the organization and leadership strategies used by the coordinating body. These factors are generalized from the Washington experience. They do not reflect an exhaustive review of the research or experiences of other states. [For the main report, "On Balance: Lessons in Effective Coordination from the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges--An Organizational Perspective," see ED534114.]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (171K)
|
Author(s): |
Cope, Kevin L. |
Source: |
New Directions for Community Colleges, n160 p31-44 Win 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Higher Education; Articulation (Education); Transfer Programs; Community Colleges; College Transfer Students; Educational Policy; Statewide Planning; Universities; Program Development; Program Descriptions
Abstract:
"Surprise" is a word and concept seldom associated with higher education policy or with one of its most demanding projects, the development of a statewide articulation and transfer program. Legislators who mandate articulation enterprises and officials who care for these behemoths present themselves as thoughtful managers who cherish meticulous research and careful planning. Whether thoughtfully or not, states usually take years or even decades to develop channels through which students may efficiently flow from high school through community colleges and on to four-year universities. As enthusiasm for statewide articulation plans percolates out from large, prosperous, inventive states to smaller, lower-scoring, and less densely populated regions of the country, the pace at which transfer degree initiatives germinate, grow, bear fruit, and occasionally wilt increases. This chapter analyzes the complex and often surprising process by which Louisiana, a small state with four higher education systems, deployed a transfer degree program in a scant two years. The author reviews the full range of challenges, from social to curricular to promotional, that were overcome and makes recommendations concerning the development of transfer degree programs under both normal and extreme or unusual circumstances.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Morelock, Kristy |
Source: |
Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, v87 n1 p44-47 Jan 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Education Work Relationship; Program Development; Vocational Education; Partnerships in Education; Transitional Programs; Program Implementation; Developmental Studies Programs; Statewide Planning; Total Quality Management; Alignment (Education); Articulation (Education); Expectation
Abstract:
Finding the best way for students to learn and achieve success is of utmost importance to the State of Illinois and the nation as a whole. College and career success is critical to the national and state economy. Career and technical education (CTE) has been central to this call for greater college completion, and the credentials that CTE provides to both traditional and nontraditional student populations have emerged as one of the most important elements in the completion agenda throughout the country. The Illinois Programs of Study (POS) framework uniquely positions the state to achieve the goal of fully articulated curriculum from secondary to postsecondary education, and to ultimately meet the call for greater college and career success. To strengthen the implementation of POS in Illinois, the Illinois Community College Board developed a statewide framework that focuses on strong stakeholder partnerships in POS implementation, and underscores that outcomes and continuous improvement are the center of program development and delivery. (Contains 3 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (360K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
School Restructuring; State Legislation; Educational Change; Education Work Relationship; Vocational Education; State Policy; Program Implementation; Career Development; Career Education; Change Strategies; Developmental Studies Programs; Career Guidance; Statewide Planning
Abstract:
Career-focused education offered through programs of study (POS), career pathways, and career and technical education (CTE) can provide students with opportunities to engage in career exploration and development, to establish career goals, to increase academic knowledge and skills, to test career preferences in applied settings, and to make links between coursework and postsecondary careers and education. Given the potential of these types of education reforms, federal and state legislation has been enacted to foster their development. In South Carolina, the state's Education and Economic Development Act (EEDA) has been integral in the implementation of POS and other career pathways. EEDA is one of the most comprehensive career-focused school-reform mandates in the country. Researchers are investigating how components of EEDA are helping to build the foundation and framework for successful POS implementation. In this article, the authors provide insights into how several key elements of the South Carolina policy are helping sample schools lay a foundation for POS and POS-like educational components for all students.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (1309K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|