Author(s): |
McKnight, John Carter |
Source: |
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, v32 n5 p361-374 Oct 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Internet; Computer Simulation; Computer Mediated Communication; Conflict; Governance; Cultural Differences; Social Systems; Ethnography; Discourse Analysis; Democracy; Participative Decision Making; Cultural Pluralism; Science and Society; Political Issues; Values
Abstract:
Early utopian notions of Internet-based community as enabling transcendence of earthly governments and cultural divides manifested in the massively multiplayer online nongame platform, Second Life. However, while platform users nearly unanimously chose governance regimes based on professional management rather than democratic self-governance, one of the few democratic experiments experienced deep conflict over precisely the utopian notions it held in common. This article examines a failed merger between two experimental democratic communities in the virtual world of Second Life as an example of the general failure of internet utopianism and a specific failure to transcend distinctions in cultures of origin (the "failure of 'convivencia,'" of the title, a term reflecting a historical model chosen by one of the communities) in a common online space. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, this article will analyze a distinction between radically different, and ultimately incommensurable, discourses around governance in the merged community amid the failure of participatory, democratic models of online governance. (Contains 2 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Reiss, Dawn |
Source: |
District Administration, v48 n9 p57-61 Oct 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Citizenship Education; Political Issues; Democracy; Grade 4; Citizen Participation; World Affairs; Citizen Role; Elementary School Students; High School Students
Abstract:
In the weeks leading up to a presidential election, it is hard to dismiss the importance of civic education, with campaign speeches, debates and advertisements blaring everywhere. Yet the National Assessment of Education Progress reports that only one-fourth of high school graduates are proficient in topics such as the American political system, principles of democracy, world affairs and the roles of citizens. With support from the U.S. Department of Education and The Pew Charitable Trusts, the nonprofit Center for Civic Education recently developed a set of standards for what students should know and be able to do in the field of civics and government at the end of grades 4, 8 and 12. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Education released a report in January arguing that civic education should be reinvigorated and reimagined. According to the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), evidence from national surveys shows the following: "[Young people who have] civic education are more likely than other students to be able to interpret political information correctly, to discuss political issues with peers and adults, to monitor the news and to feel confident about their ability to speak in public. Additionally, students who have experienced interactive civic education show a better ability to clearly express their opinions, have better collaborative group skills and have a better ability to work in culturally diverse teams."
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Research Utilization; Instructional Leadership; Educational Research; Information Dissemination; Context Effect; Political Issues; Higher Education
Abstract:
Within this article, the authors explore the disconnect between research production, dissemination, and utilization, particularly within the field of educational leadership in the United States. Their exploration begins with an examination of the macro-level contexts within which such activities currently take place. They then turn to an examination of the relative value placed on educational research and its utilization as well as the threats that emerge when high-quality research is not (perceived as) accessible or aligned with perceived needs. Through their explorations, the authors identify significant challenges to research utilization, challenges they argue can be understood, addressed, and overcome. (Contains 7 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Manuel, Jeffrey T. |
Source: |
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, v11 n4 p380-386 Oct 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Opinion Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Political Attitudes; College Instruction; Course Content; Intellectual History; Political Issues; Politics of Education; Books
Abstract:
What does it mean to engage deeply with conservatism in the classroom? Are classroom politics determined by a professor's personal political opinions or by course content? Historian Paul Lyons takes up these timely questions in his slim but intriguing book "American Conservatism: Thinking It, Teaching It." The book is divided in two parts. Part one contains Lyons's teaching log from a seminar on conservatism in the United States that he taught during spring semester 2006 at Stockton College, a private liberal arts college in New Jersey, USA. Part two is more traditional. It contains several essays in which Lyons analyzes US conservatism through the lens of American exceptionalism and intellectual history. Readers may feel some whiplash moving between the two parts of the book since the teaching log is informal and intimate while the essays are stuffier. Nonetheless, both halves have something to offer readers interested in the relationship between politics, teaching, and research.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|