|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-05-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Geometry; World Problems; Physical Geography; Geometric Concepts; Mathematics; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematics Education; Mathematics Curriculum; Problem Solving; Mathematical Concepts; Professional Personnel; Motion
Abstract:
For students who have difficulty envisioning how the mathematics that they are learning is used outside the classroom, an adventure as field mathematicians can be enlightening. Measuring stream discharge is a field experience that allows students to engage in a hands-on (and boots-on) real-world, problem-solving activity and that integrates mathematics with physical geography. The term "stream discharge" refers to the volume of water per second that passes a cross-sectional plane on a stream. It is perhaps the most important way that a scientist can describe the size of a stream. The overarching goal of this activity is to have students connect familiar fundamental mathematical concepts and develop a method to solve a sophisticated, real-world problem. The mathematical content includes the important topic of modeling real-world phenomena; flexibility in understanding how the dimensions of width, depth, distance, and time can be combined to express velocity, area, and stream discharge; and a practical application of summation notation to find the area of the irregularly shaped cross section of the streambed by partitioning it into smaller rectangles. Students must first understand what it means to measure the discharge of a stream, devise a method to measure the discharge, and then implement their plan. Finally, they reflect on their result and interpret it in a concrete manner. (Contains 5 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Information Sources; Internet; Protocol Analysis; Information Literacy; Scientific and Technical Information; Physical Geography; Information Retrieval; Reading Comprehension; Critical Reading; Cognitive Processes; Achievement Gains; Pretests Posttests; Undergraduate Students
Abstract:
Readers increasingly attempt to understand and learn from information sources they find on the Internet. Doing so highlights the crucial role that evaluative processes play in selecting and making sense of the information. In a prior study, Wiley et al. (2009, Experiment 1) asked undergraduates to perform a web-based inquiry task about volcanoes using multiple Internet sources. A major finding established a clear link between learning outcomes, source evaluations, and reading behaviors. The present study used think-aloud protocol methodology to better understand the processing that learners engaged in during this task: 10 better learners were contrasted with 11 poorer learners. Results indicate that better learners engaged in more sense-making, self-explanation, and comprehension-monitoring processes on reliable sites as compared with unreliable sites, and did so by a larger margin than did poorer learners. Better learners also engaged in more goal-directed navigation than poorer learners. Case studies of two better and two poorer learners further illustrate how evaluation processes contributed to navigation decisions. Findings suggest that multiple-source comprehension is a dynamic process that involves interplay among sense-making, monitoring, and evaluation processes, all of which promote strategic reading. (Contains 7 tables and 1 note.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Balci, Ali |
Source: |
Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, v12 n2 p988-997 Spr 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Field Trips; Human Geography; Grade 5; Geography Instruction; Physical Geography; Field Experience Programs; Student Experience; Student Teacher Attitudes; Field Studies; Pretests Posttests; Expectation; Participant Satisfaction; Foreign Countries; Program Effectiveness; Qualitative Research; Preservice Teacher Education
Abstract:
The aim of this study is to establish expectations of 5th grade students from Marmara University's Department of Geography Teaching on geographical field study in Western Anatolia. For this reason, a field study trip was organized to Western Anatolia. A survey, which was consisted of open-ended questions, was prepared by experts and it was conducted on students before and after the study. The survey revealed that 32.2% of the expectations were related to physical geography, 23.1% to human geography and 44.7% to economic geography. The accumulated data were analyzed using descriptive analysis technique. In conclusion, expectations of students were substantially satisfied after field study. After the fieldwork experience, 67.8% of student expectations were fully met, 7.1% of them were partially met, while 25.1% of their expectations were not fulfilled. It was also established that the rate of fulfilled expectations related to economic and human geography was higher than those related to physical geography. The findings were interpreted and suggestions were made concerning the issue.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (656K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-04-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Evidence; Undergraduate Students; Student Attitudes; Physical Geography; Climate; Misconceptions; Credibility; Measures (Individuals); Introductory Courses; Interdisciplinary Approach; Science Instruction; Science Education; College Science; Instructional Effectiveness; Pretests Posttests; Comparative Analysis; Time; Weather
Abstract:
Overcoming students' misconceptions may be a challenge when teaching about phenomena such as climate change. Students tend to cite short-term weather effects as evidence to support or refute long-term climate transformations, which displays a fundamental misunderstanding about weather and climate distinctions. Confusion about weather and climate may also reflect student misunderstanding about deep time, a concept that spans several scientific content areas. This study examines the relationships between students' understanding of deep time and their understandings of the distinctions between weather and climate, as well as how these understandings influence students' perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced global climate change. Undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory science class on global climate change completed measures of their (a) understanding of distinctions between weather and climate, (b) knowledge of deep time, and (c) plausibility perceptions of human-induced climate change, both at the beginning and end of the course. The study includes comparison groups of similar students enrolled in introductory physical geography classes. Results revealed that greater knowledge of deep time and increased plausibility perceptions of human-induced climate change provide significant explanation of variance in students' understanding of weather and climate distinctions. Furthermore, students achieve significantly increased understanding of weather and climate, even with brief instruction.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Direct Instruction; Cartography; Elementary Secondary Education; World Geography; Human Geography; Academic Achievement; Classes (Groups of Students); Physical Geography; Geography Instruction; Higher Education; Community Colleges; Two Year College Students; Comparative Analysis; Attendance; English Language Learners; Native Speakers; Educational Technology; Multimedia Instruction
Abstract:
In this study done at a community college in South Florida, the achievements of students who spoke English as their second language who had attended their K-12 education outside the United States in their home countries, in a U.S. college course on world geography are compared with the achievements of students in the same classes who spoke English as their first language and who had attended their K-12 education in U.S. schools. It is important to mention that 25% of the students who had attended their K-12 education in U.S. schools in this research were taking college classes at the same time they were studying at high school. In order to help level the playing field for both groups of students, the courses, which were 29 classes each, were taught in a classroom setting using visual computerized technology including PowerPoint presentations, DVDs, virtual fieldtrips, and online exploration of geographic data to explain all points of pedagogical interest instead of relying solely on direct instruction based on the textbooks used for these classes. Attendance was taken orally by the researcher for each class and these attendance sheets were the basis for determining student participation. Only students who attended all or all but one of the classes were included in the study. One of the important components of this study was the exposure of the students to highly visual and, hence, contextual, classroom lessons. The results of this research show no significant difference between the rates of achievement of the two groups, a resounding success in and of itself, given the difference in language proficiency levels of non-U.S.- and U.S.-educated students, although there are two interesting anomalies. There are very slight, non-statistically significant indications of superior achievement by the non-U.S.-educated students in human geography, cartography, and overall scores, and very slight, non-statistically significant indications of superior achievement by the U.S.-educated students in physical geography. (Contains 2 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|