|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Psychological Patterns; Public Service; Altruism; Government (Administrative Body); Presidents; Citizenship Responsibility; Leadership Responsibility; Social Responsibility; Philosophy; Individual Characteristics
Abstract:
Plato noticed a sizeable problem apropos of establishing his republic--that there was always a ready pool of zealous potential rulers, lying in wait for a suitable opportunity to rule on their own tyrannical terms. He also recognized that those persons best suited to rule, those persons with foursquare and unimpeachable virtue, would be least motivated to govern. Ruling a polis meant that those persons, fully educated and in complete realization that the most complete happiness comprises solitary study of things unchanging, would have to compromise their happiness for the wellbeing of their polis and of the people in it. Plato's solution, in effect that the aristoi would merely recognize their duty to sacrifice personal happiness for the happiness of the polis, has perplexed and continues today to perplex scholars. Like Plato, Jefferson recognized that there was always a pool of eager sharks, ready to govern. His republicanism, comprising a ward system and general education, was founded on the fullest participation of its citizenry, suitably educated and a governing aristoi. The true aristoi, the "natural aristoi", are the intelligent and virtuous and that government is best which allows for a "pure selection" of the natural aristoi into the governing offices. Nonetheless, as Jefferson's own life shows, non-parochial governing meant being rent from domestic tranquility, being forced to leave behind one's personal affairs to decay, and being tossed willy-nilly into the coliseum of nonstop political wrangling. Why would anyone, particularly one wanting to be happy, wish to govern? Thus, Jefferson faced the same problem that Plato faced. How could a state be structured so that the wisest and most virtuous would be motivated to rule? In this paper, I argue that Jefferson, in full recognition of the problem of encouraging the most intelligent and virtuous to govern, the problem of public service, offers a solution that is remarkably Platonic.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Downs, Donald A. |
Source: |
Academic Questions, v25 n3 p343-347 Sep 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-09-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Opinion Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Citizenship; Democracy; Citizenship Education; Citizenship Responsibility; Democratic Values; Educational Principles; Research Reports; Civics; United States Government (Course); Culturally Relevant Education; Change Strategies; Educational Change; Educational Assessment; Educational Indicators
Abstract:
This article presents the author's critique on a new report titled "A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy's Future", and focuses on civic education and civic engagement. The Obama administration's new report confronts a genuine problem in American education. The decline of civic education and knowledge in America is one of the few problems about which both sides of the political spectrum can agree, at least in principle. Many surveys and studies in recent years have exposed a stunning lack of basic knowledge among the citizenry--especially the young--about America's constitutional system and the political systems of other countries. The author argues that, in assuming a decidedly progressive posture on civic education and engagement, the report ironically represents a failure of the civic education and engagement it purports to champion. The author's point here is that a persuasive report on civic education and engagement that attempts to see things from a higher perspective should recognize two truths: (1) that profound and legitimate disagreement reigns over the best solutions to problems the report cites; and (2) "that recognizing this disagreement is essential to civic education and engagement." He contends that "Crucible" will generate creedal passion in its own right. But it lets one down by failing to integrate creedal disagreement into its vision of citizenship, civic engagement, and civic education. (Contains 8 footnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Books; Guides - Classroom - Teacher |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Creativity; State Standards; Problem Solving; Metacognition; Technological Literacy; Thinking Skills; Critical Thinking; Communication Skills; Cooperation; Leadership; College Readiness; Careers; Check Lists; Citizenship Responsibility; Global Approach; Mastery Learning; Student Evaluation; Experiential Learning
Abstract:
The Common Core State Standards clearly define the skills students need for success in college and the 21st century workplace. The question is, how can you measure student mastery of skills like creativity, problem solving, and use of technology? Laura Greenstein demonstrates how teachers can teach and assess 21st century skills using authentic learning experiences and rigorous, varied assessment strategies. Based on the best ideas of renowned experts in education, this book provides a framework and practical ideas for measuring: (1) Thinking skills: critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, and metacognition; (2) Actions: communication, collaboration, digital and technological literacy; and (3) Living skills: citizenship, global understanding, leadership, college and career readiness. Included are numerous rubrics and checklists, a step-by-step model for developing your own classroom assessments, a lesson planning template, and sample completed lesson plans. "Assessing 21st Century Skills" gives you the tools and strategies you need to prepare students to succeed in a rapidly changing world.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Fleming, Nora |
Source: |
Education Week, v32 n8 p1, 18 Oct 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-17 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Graduation Requirements; State Standards; Standardized Tests; Civics; Elections; Federal Legislation; Social Studies; Citizen Participation; Citizenship Education; Citizenship Responsibility; Educational Needs; Educational Practices; Educational Policy; Educational Testing; Social Attitudes
Abstract:
The 2012 presidential election and many state and local races are only a few weeks away, but schools are not doing much to promote student interest in the elections or provide civic education more broadly, new research suggests. A report last week from the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), at Tufts University, in Medford, Massachusetts, found only eight states have standardized tests specifically in civics education at the high school level, and Ohio and Virginia alone require students to pass them to graduate. It also says only 21 states mandate that students take a social studies test--the broader discipline that includes history, geography, and civics--and only nine require that they pass it to earn a diploma. That number is down from 34 states that conducted regular assessments in 2001. And most of those tests, according to the findings, are weakly linked to state standards and do not test deeper knowledge of the subject matter at hand. The findings help document what many in education have been saying since the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act more than a decade ago. An emphasis on reading and mathematics, driven by the law's testing and accountability requirements, has cut into the time and attention devoted to some of the other subjects.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-12-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Teaching Methods; Scientific Research; Social Sciences; Citizenship Education; Citizenship Responsibility; Science Education; Conservation (Environment); Citizen Participation; Elementary Secondary Education; High Schools; Social Problems; Questionnaires; Inquiry; Data Collection
Abstract:
In recent years, citizen science projects have emerged as a means to involve students in scientific inquiry, particularly in the fields of ecology and environmental science. A citizen scientist is "a volunteer who collects and/or processes data as part of a scientific inquiry" (Silverton 2009, p. 467). Participation in citizen science fosters an appreciation for the diversity of scientific fields (i.e., conservation biology, ornithology). The National Science Foundation (NSF) supports citizen science projects as a means to recruit future generations into the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines by directly involving students in scientific research. Teachers have expanded citizen science projects to include not only gathering and analyzing data but also civic participation and action (Zaikowski and Lichtman 2007; Ryken et al. 2008). This effectively merges hard sciences with social sciences. In this article, the authors present the multidisciplinary Project Citizen approach to teaching and learning science and engaging students in action-oriented citizen science. Project Citizen, a curricular program administered by a national network of coordinators in every state, promotes competent and responsible civic participation by giving students a vehicle to influence and monitor public policy (Center for Civic Education 2009). High school teachers can adapt Project Citizen as an approach for teaching a variety of subject areas. English teachers can use Project Citizen to emphasize speech and writing skills; social studies teachers can emphasize civic ideas and practices; and mathematics and science teachers can focus on analytical thinking and scientific inquiry. (Contains 3 figures and 2 online resources.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|