|
|
Pub Date: |
2005-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Teacher Retirement; Retirement Benefits; College Faculty; Incentives; Eligibility; Tenure; Aging (Individuals); Health Conditions; Teaching Conditions; Preretirement Education; Family Work Relationship; Emotional Response
Abstract:
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the graying of America's college and university faculty coincided with new federal regulations that prohibited mandatory retirement. So in order to both encourage faculty retirements and assume better control of when positions would be vacated about half of all U.S. colleges and universities adopted various retirement incentives and processes. "Phased retirement" was one of the most popular of these strategies. Because of its prominence, in 2003-04 the authors conducted a study of the experience of individuals and institutions with phased retirement. They began by analyzing data from the 1999 National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty. They then interviewed 105 faculty and administrators on 12 widely varied campuses, and an electronic survey drew responses from another 45 individuals. This article is an overview of some of their key findings about how phased retirement works for individuals who participate in these plans and for the institutions that offer them. (Contains 6 resources.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2002-11-21 |
Pub Type(s): |
Opinion Papers; Speeches/Meeting Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Finance; Educational Improvement; Educational Research; Higher Education; Scholarship
Abstract:
This paper considers how educators can best arrive at "big, good ideas" for the improvement of higher education and how they can best put them to use where they are needed. Getting big, good ideas probably comes from working on big, good questions. There is a substantial body of research literature about the big questions of education, and it is evident that the "big" ideas come from "big scholarship" that is integrative, pragmatic, collaborative, and cumulative. Educational research needs additional funding, from more diverse sources, and researchers need to communicate what they know to practitioners and the public. Collaboration will enhance scholarship and that will lead to the big ideas that result in better learning. (SLD)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (218K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2002-03-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative; Tests/Questionnaires |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
College Faculty; Faculty Workload; Higher Education; National Surveys; Part Time Faculty; Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Characteristics
Abstract:
Part-time faculty members are a sizeable part of the workforce in postsecondary institutions today. Forty-two percent of all instructional faculty and staff were employed part time by their institutions in the fall of 1992, and 44 percent of those individuals were teaching in two-year institutions. Data from the 1993 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty provide valuable insight into the characteristics of this group of faculty from a national perspective. Responses were received from 817 eligible institutions and 25,780 faculty and staff members. A nationally representative sample of faculty and instructional staff received questionnaires in 1993 that asked about their employment in the fall of 1992. This report contains estimates of the characteristics, qualifications, motivations, work patterns, and attitudes of part-time instructional faculty and staff in four-year and two-year institutions by program area in fall 1992. The report compares part-time and full-time faculty, examines some common perceptions about part-time faculty, and provides a comprehensive source of descriptive statistics about part-time faculty. Appendixes contain technical notes and a glossary. (Contains 69 tables, 7 figures, and 23 references.) (SLD)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (2221K)
|
|