Author(s): |
ChanLin, Lih-Juan |
Source: |
Innovations in Education and Teaching International, v49 n3 p319-331 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Electronic Learning; Time Management; Online Courses; Learning Strategies; Task Analysis; Interaction; Educational Technology; Internet; Information Processing; Web Based Instruction; Computer Mediated Communication; Student Centered Curriculum; Colleges; Higher Education; Outcomes of Education; Active Learning; Student Projects; Cooperative Learning; Academic Achievement; College Students
Abstract:
Web-based learning promotes computer-mediated interaction and student-centred learning in most higher education institutions. To fulfil their academic requirements, students develop appropriate strategies to support learning. Purposes of this study were to: (1) examine the relationship between students study strategies (assessed by Learning and Study Strategies Inventory [LASSI]) with their learning outcomes and online interaction and (2) observe the development of strategies among students in the web-supported collaborative project. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered. The results of the study revealed that some LASSI constructs were significant in predicting students' online learning achievement, including: anxiety, time management, use of support/material and test strategies (p less than 0.05). Students' interaction significantly correlated with: attitude, motivation, information processing, selecting the main idea, use of support/material and test strategies (p less than 0.05). In addition to LASSI, strategies were identified in the study, including: task analysis, information utilisation, group coordination, self-review and task refinement. (Contains 4 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Political Attitudes; Faculty Workload; United States Government (Course); Audiences; Dropout Rate; Conventional Instruction; Online Courses; Web Based Instruction; Attitude Change; Comparative Analysis; Pretests Posttests; Longitudinal Studies; Outcomes of Education; Instructional Effectiveness; College Instruction; College Students; Student Attitudes; Newspapers
Abstract:
In 1997 we first offered American government classes online as well as face-to-face classes. We administered pre- and posttests to our students to measure their general knowledge of American government, political attitudes, demographics, and some behaviors. Following an initial report in 2001, we continued to gather data for 10 more years; this current study covers nearly 3,200 students during 13 years. We examine the sample as a whole and changes in audiences and outcomes, over time, for the two teaching formats. Although the kinds of students taking online classes have become more similar, a few differences persist. Learning outcome differences continue to be insignificant. Neither format has a clear advantage in students' changes in attitudes, but the online classes increased students' newspaper reading. Class dropout rate and faculty workload both favor face-to-face classes, but flexibility in scheduling and student demand clearly favor online classes.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Credentials; Community Colleges; College Credits; School Counselors; Guidance; Higher Education; Outcomes of Education; Enrollment; Two Year Colleges; Academic Achievement; College Students; Academic Advising; Educational Counseling; College Preparation; Student Personnel Services
Abstract:
Past research has revealed that students who complete coursework in a concentrated area, defined as completing three or more courses in a specific field of study, are much more likely to have successful outcomes than those who do not. Moreover, fewer than half of students included in this research, which followed students over seven years, entered into concentrated fields of study. Of students attending Achieving the Dream's earliest participating colleges, students still enrolled after three years accumulated an average of about 60 credits. Students still enrolled during the fourth year, accumulated an average of about 70 credits; fifth year, nearly 80 credits; and sixth or seventh years, well over 80 credits. Assuming 60 credits are needed to attain an associate's degree, these students with long-term enrollments are accumulating credits above and beyond that required for credentials. Students accumulating large numbers of credits without attaining credentials or transferring could be the result of a lack of focus on a particular pathway or program of study. Credential-seeking students who complete large numbers of courses, but are not necessarily following coherent pathways, are at risk of becoming frustrated and dropping out. Many community college students, especially those who are first-generation and are from low socioeconomic status families, may not have the experience or the opportunity to receive guidance from friends and family to help them navigate and pursue coherent academic pathways. Adding to the problem, as institutional finances tighten, institutions may restrict student services, including guidance counselors and advisors. This analysis investigates students' outcomes after five years--did they complete, transfer, or were they still enrolled? If they did not complete or transfer, the number of credits the student accumulated is examined. Five-year outcomes by race/ethnicity, Pell Grant status, attendance status, major field area, and the number of developmental subjects referred to were examined to determine if differences occur by student groups. (Contains 2 figures and 7 footnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (446K)
|
Author(s): |
Reddy, Diane M.; Pfeiffer, Heidi M.; Fleming, Raymond; Ports, Katie A.; Pedrick, Laura E.; Barnack-Tavlaris, Jessica L.; Jirovec, Danielle L.; Helion, Alicia M.; Swain, Rodney A. |
Source: |
Online Submission, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks v17 n1 p147-154 Jan 2013 |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Academic Achievement; Achievement Gap; Study Skills; Motivation; Integrated Learning Systems; Disadvantaged; Electronic Learning; Online Courses; Feedback (Response); Educational Change; Comparative Analysis; Evaluation; Higher Education; Distance Education; Undergraduate Students; Time Management
Abstract:
"U-Pace," an instructional intervention, has potential for widespread implementation because student behavior recorded in any learning management system is used by "U-Pace" instructors to tailor coaching of student learning based on students' strengths and motivations. "U-Pace" utilizes an online learning environment to integrate content mastery with Amplified Assistance (instructor-initiated, individually tailored feedback on concepts not yet mastered and constructive support that every student receives via email weekly or more often as needed). Evaluation findings for "U-Pace" instruction revealed that compared to conventional, face-to-face instruction, "U-Pace" instruction was associated with greater academic success for all students and reductions in the achievement gap for "disadvantaged" students. Additionally, "disadvantaged" "U-Pace" students showed improvements in the rate of content mastery and intrinsic motivation. Consistent with these indicators of improvement in self-regulated learning skills, "U-Pace" students reported greater improvements in their time management and study skills, greater control over their learning and a greater sense of achievement than conventionally-taught students. The convergence of findings from student reports, performance measures recorded within the learning management system, and objectively determined grades suggests "U-Pace" instruction holds promise for higher education. (Contains 2 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (220K)
|
|