|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-03-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Strategies; Learning Strategies; Critical Thinking; Misconceptions; Thinking Skills; Teaching Methods; Teacher Role; Student Participation; Inquiry; Learner Engagement; Relevance (Education); Problem Solving; Science Instruction; Science Teachers; Prior Learning; Questioning Techniques; Inferences; Prediction
Abstract:
Too often, teachers scratch their heads and ask, "What were my students thinking?" then answer, "I don't want to know." But teachers should want to know, and students should question their own thinking, as well. Critical thinking involves not just problem solving, creativity, analysis, and synthesis but also self-awareness of learning and learning strategies. This article offers instructional strategies that teach students to think critically. Fostering critical thinking requires shifting from a teacher-centered classroom to a critical thinking-centered classroom. This involves relinquishing the role of a teacher as the sole disseminator of knowledge and structuring lessons to allow for student inquiry, research, and collaboration. By providing students with inquiry-based, engaging, rigorous, real-world content and teaching them to monitor their own learning, schools can create a generation of learners capable of solving the problems of the 21st century. (Contains 2 figures and 1 online resource.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2011-04-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Learner Engagement; Feedback (Response); Educational Strategies; Concept Mapping; Class Activities; Student Attitudes; Botany; Biology; Thinking Skills; Teaching Methods; Critical Thinking; Student Surveys; Creativity; Problem Solving; Student Participation; Undergraduate Students; Undergraduate Study; Lecture Method; Classification; Active Learning
Abstract:
Active-learning techniques have been advocated as a means to promote student engagement in lower-division biology courses. In this case study, mini-lectures in combination with active-learning activities were evaluated as strategies to promote a culture of learning and participation in a required botany course. These activities were designed to develop critical-thinking skills, i.e. Bloom's synthesis, application, and analysis. Student attitudes toward learning, participation, and class activities were assessed with feedback surveys following each activity, at the beginning with a pre-survey and at the end of the semester with a retrospective survey. Students identified concept maps, problem-solving exercises, and the categorizing grid as helpful to their learning. Based on instructor observations, students were especially engaged in activities that allowed them to demonstrate creativity and resourcefulness. Based on the retrospective survey results, students were more conservative in their perception of personal critical-thinking skills at the end of the semester, which may be a reaction to the challenges in developing critical-thinking skills. The incorporation of mini-lectures with class activities helped to promote student engagement in the classroom and thus, was a positive instructional strategy. (Contains 2 tables and 2 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (142K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Author(s): |
Loji, K. |
Source: |
South African Journal of Higher Education, v26 n1 p120-135 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Thinking Skills; Learner Engagement; Teaching Methods; Engineering; Learning Strategies; Foreign Countries; Problem Solving; Learning Processes; Educational Innovation; Engineering Education; Comprehension; Scientific Concepts; Cognitive Structures; Student Surveys
Abstract:
Problem solving skills and abilities are critical in life and more specifically in the engineering field. Unfortunately, significant numbers of South African students who are accessing higher education lack problem solving skills and this results in poor academic performance jeopardizing their progress especially from first to second year. On the other hand, teaching problem solving to under-prepared first year learners is a challenge to academics that are required to think in innovative ways about teaching and learning strategies in order to respond in an efficient manner to South Africa's high demand for quality engineering graduates. This article discusses two successful sample lessons of how higher-order thinking skills can be integrated into the content of a so called "bottle-neck" subject namely Electrical Engineering 1 (EE1) with the goal of enhancing problem solving skills and consequently improve under-prepared learners' performance. The importance of developing active student engagement practice as well as conceptual understanding is highlighted. (Contains 4 tables and 8 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2011-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Sociology; Learning Processes; Inquiry; Reflection; Self Concept; Writing Assignments; Critical Thinking; Thinking Skills; Learner Engagement; Introductory Courses; Teaching Methods; College Students
Abstract:
Inspired by inquiry-guided learning and critical self-reflection as pedagogical approaches, we describe exercises that encourage students to develop critical thinking skills through inquiry and reflective writing. Students compile questions and reflections throughout the course and, at the end of the term, use their writings for a comprehensive analytic self-reflection that examines their intellectual and sociological growth. Following Schwalbe's (2008) urging to emphasize sociological "thinking" over disciplinary nuances in introductory courses, we describe several complementary methods for teaching students how to think like sociologists. We detail five inquiry exercises and three reflection exercises that build up to the final analytic reflection essay. The unique value of these exercises is that students not only engage the course material throughout the course but also learn to examine their own writing as data. In doing so, students learn to value the process of learning, inquiry, and critical self-reflection while acquiring and constructing self-knowledge. (Contains 3 notes, 1 figure, and 1 table.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|