Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
Center for Innovation in Assessment |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Grade 3; Elementary School Students; Content Area Reading; Textbooks; Reading Instruction; Reading Tests; Diagnostic Tests; Surveys; Reading Strategies; Reading Comprehension; Testing; Prediction; Vocabulary; Teaching Guides; Instructional Materials
Abstract:
The Grade 3 Informational Text Reading Inventory (ITRI) was developed to address the specific reading challenges that grade 3 students encounter as they move from reading largely narrative textbooks in grade 2 to being expected to read and comprehend more dense and content-driven text in grade 3. This booklet contains all of the information teachers need to use the Grade 3 ITRI materials, including assessments, lessons and graphic organizers, answer keys, student scoring sheets, and a survey of the scientifically-based reading research that is foundational to ITRI. Because all Grade 3 ITRI content comes from "Indiana's Academic Standards" for grade 3, the ITRI materials will enhance the subject matter teachers already teach. Students will always learn the reading skills within the context of their content area curriculum. Appended are: (1) Critical Differences in Grade 2 and Grade 3 Textbooks; (2) The Scientifically-Based Reading Research (SBRR) Behind Grade 3 ITRI; (3) Chart of Academic Standards Addressed Across the Curriculum; (4) Metacognitive Reading Survey Scoring Key; (5) Scoring Sheet: ITRI Assessments; (6) Scoring Sheet: Grade 3 ITRI Lessons; (7) Instructions for Using the Graphic Organizers with Hop To It; and (8) ITRI Acknowledgements. A glossary and an index are included.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (23540K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-05-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Factor Analysis; Psychopathology; Validity; Behavior Disorders; Adolescents; Questionnaires; Emotional Disturbances; Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; Probability; Comorbidity; Surveys; Peer Relationship; Prosocial Behavior; Race; Ethnicity; Gender Differences; Scores; Income; Prediction; Screening Tests
Abstract:
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is one of the most commonly used instruments for screening psychopathology in children and adolescents. This study evaluated the hypothesized five-factor structure of the SDQ and examined its convergent validity against comprehensive clinical diagnostic assessments. Data were derived from the National Comorbidity Survey--Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A), a nationally representative sample of U.S. adolescents aged 13 to 18 years. Parents/parent surrogates (n=6,483) was asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire including the SDQ and DSM-IV comprehensive diagnostic information on the participating adolescents. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the factor structure of the SDQ. The five-factor solution of the SDQ (including emotional, conduct, hyperactivity-inattention, peer relationship, and prosocial) provided a satisfactory fit to the data, and was invariant across sex, age, race/ethnicity and income subgroups. SDQ scores predicted a significantly increased probability of meeting criteria for a DSM-IV disorder, with better prediction for behavior disorders than for mood disorders. Decreasing the SDQ cutoffs to the 80th percentile significantly increased the sensitivity from 39% to 63% for the SDQ Total Difficulties Score, with an expected decrease in specificity from 93% to 87%. This work confirms the five-factor structure of the SDQ in an ethnically and sociodemographically diverse community sample of adolescents. Our findings strengthen empirical evidence for the use of the parent-reported SDQ as a screening tool for DSM-IV behavioral and emotional disorders in adolescents identified in the general population.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Moreillon, Judi |
Source: |
School Library Monthly, v29 n2 p5-8 Nov 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-11-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Reading Instruction; Teaching Methods; Library Services; Reading Comprehension; Academic Standards; Team Teaching; Librarian Teacher Cooperation; Best Practices; Reading Strategies; Library Role; Content Area Reading
Abstract:
Just as the mission of the library program evolves from the school's mission, the goals of school librarians' curriculum and teaching evolves from the needs of administrators and classroom teachers. In the 21st-century, these needs are framed by standards such as Common Core State Standards (CCSS). School librarians also have the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) "Standards for the 21st-Century Learner" that serves as a guide for information literacy standards that correlate easily to the CCSS. The task of aligning the library program with standards initiatives is essential work for 21st-century school librarians. Using this context, how can school librarians best position their work at the core of the academic program? Reading and writing across the curriculum and collaborative literacy teams are central themes of the CCSS. However, most content-area teachers are not taught how to teach reading comprehension during their preservice teacher preparation programs. Many do not think teaching reading (or writing) is or should be their job. This creates a perfect opportunity for a school librarian to practice job-embedded professional development, in which educators learn together in site-based, authentic professional learning opportunities that position school librarians in a leadership role (Yukawa and Harada 2011). Just as athletes "play to their strengths," school librarians can play to their strengths as well. Research shows that the impact of school libraries on student achievement is most evident in the area of reading. Also, library stakeholders, government officials, and the general public already associate libraries with reading. If the question is how school librarians can propel the profession into prominence in the current educational climate, the answer is coteaching reading comprehension strategies. In a collaborative climate focused on literacy improvement, school librarians can serve as teacher leaders as states transition to the CCSS and other literacy initiatives. (Contains 2 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2011-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Ethnicity; Gender Differences; Student Evaluation; Socioeconomic Status; Formative Evaluation; Program Effectiveness; Reading Ability; Guidelines; Knowledge Level; Comparative Analysis; High School Students; Agricultural Education; Instructional Program Divisions; Content Area Reading; Standardized Tests; Scores
Abstract:
The National Research Council has recognized the challenge of assessing laboratory investigation and called for the investigation of assessments that are proven through sound research-based studies. The Vee map provides a framework that allows the learners to conceptualize their previous knowledge as they develop success in meaningful learning when they utilize the Vee map to guide their thinking and the process of experimentation. Previous research has shown that using the Vee map as a formative assessment tool positively affects student content knowledge. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of student demographic variables on student content knowledge achievement when using the Vee map as a formative assessment tool. The population of this quasi-experimental, counter-balance design study was composed of students at nine high schools that offered agriscience education. The results of this study indicated the Vee map is unbiased based on gender, grade, and ethnicity. It was also concluded that the Vee map does not provide either remedial or non-remedial readers with a significant advantage, thus allowing the assessment to focus on the content rather than a student's reading ability. (Contains 5 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (153K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|