Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
What Works Clearinghouse |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-04-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
College Credits; Program Effectiveness; High School Students; First Generation College Students; Dual Enrollment; Academic Degrees; Educational Attainment; Comparative Analysis; Probability; Socioeconomic Status; Correlation
Abstract:
The study reviewed in this paper used data from the National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS:88) to examine the effects of dual enrollment programs for high school students on college degree attainment. The study further reported on whether the impacts of dual enrollment were different for first generation college students. Dual enrollment programs allow high school students to take college courses and earn college credits while still in high school. The study could potentially "meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence standards with reservations." However, the WWC does not have enough information about baseline equivalence (i.e., the adequacy of the propensity score matching process) to determine the study rating. A more thorough review (forthcoming) will determine the rating for the study and report more fully on its results. [The following study is reviewed in this "Quick Review": An, B. P. (2013). "The impact of dual enrollment on college degree attainment: Do low-SES students benefit?" "Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis".]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (87K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Numerical/Quantitative Data; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Dual Enrollment; Vocational Education; Partnerships in Education; College School Cooperation; High School Students; College Students; Philanthropic Foundations; Academic Support Services; Access to Education; Comparative Analysis; Longitudinal Studies; Control Groups; Experimental Groups; Outcomes of Education; Educational Indicators; Academic Persistence; Program Effectiveness; Graduation Rate; College Credits; Grade Point Average; Disproportionate Representation; Data Analysis; Community Colleges; At Risk Students; Federal Aid
Abstract:
The Concurrent Courses Initiative (CCI), funded by The James Irvine Foundation from 2008 until 2011, comprised eight secondary/postsecondary partnerships across California that offered dual enrollment programs with supplemental student supports. The goal of the CCI was to expand access to supportive, career-focused dual enrollment for students often underserved by such programs and underrepresented in higher education, with the expectation that participating students would prosper in college subsequently. We use longitudinal administrative data on individual students who participated in 2008-09 and 2009-10, compared with data on other students from their districts, to test for evidence of differences in outcomes. Relative to comparison students, CCI dual enrollees had similar GPAs but higher graduation rates in high school. CCI dual enrollees entered college at similar rates to the comparison group, but entered four-year institutions and persisted at higher rates. Notably, CCI dual enrollees accumulated more college credits than the comparison group, and this difference in credit accumulation grew over time. After two years in college, CCI dual enrollees had accumulated 20 percent more credits than their district peers. These are the results of the data pooled across the sites; we also report results for the individual sites, which vary. Appended are: (1) Partnership Overview; and (2) Supplemental Activities. (Contains 14 tables and 19 footnotes.)[To access "Bridging College and Careers: Using Dual Enrollment to Enhance Career and Technical Education Pathways. NCPR Brief" see ED533874.]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (208K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-01-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Change; High Schools; Charter Schools; Secondary School Teachers; Principals; Assistant Principals; Teacher Attitudes; Administrator Attitudes; Teacher Characteristics; Teacher Evaluation; Faculty Mobility; Teacher Recruitment; Teacher Persistence; Teacher Effectiveness; Academic Achievement; High School Students; Interviews; Comparative Analysis; Student Surveys
Abstract:
With funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, CRESST researchers conducted a multi-year evaluation of a major school reform project at Alain Leroy Locke High School, historically one of California's lowest performing secondary schools. We found the one-year teacher retention rate at GDL in 2010-2011 was 79%; Green Dot Locke teachers, overall, were more highly educated than their LAUSD counterpart (including their peers at neighboring high schools) in 2010-2011; and GDL teachers were more likely to be non-White and teacher staff were more racially diverse than LAUSD teachers. Comparing the teachers who stayed (i.e., "stayers") and those who left ("movers") as of 2010-2011 school year, we did not detect any significant differences in age, gender, years of teaching at GDPS, student growth percentile scores or student course pass rates between movers and stayers. We did find a difference in the percentage of teachers meeting or exceeding the evaluation standards, in favor of stayers, and White and English teachers were more likely to be movers. Exploring the relationship between available multiple measures of teacher quality, we found small correlations, between three evaluation scores and student growth percentile (SGP) scores. We also found small to medium positive relationships between teacher evaluation scores with Tripod measures, and the majority of these were statistically significant. While these correlations are not surprising, they are also not robust. Additionally, there was considerable variation across academies on numerous measures (e.g., teacher survey results, interview accounts). While the purpose of this report was not to investigate or compare professional capacity across academies, this appears to be an important part of the Green Dot Locke story to be examined more closely in the future. Appended are: (1) Teacher Interview Protocol; (2) Principal Interview Protocol; (3) 2010-2011 End Of Year Survey Results; and (4) Interview Comments on Green Dot Core Tenets. (Contains 22 tables, 7 figures and 33 footnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (1803K)
|
Author(s): |
N/A |
Source: |
James Irvine Foundation |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
College Credits; Dual Enrollment; Non English Speaking; Career Development; Disproportionate Representation; Underachievement; High School Students; High Schools; Minority Groups; Comparative Analysis; Graduation Rate; Access to Education; Academic Persistence; Universities; Two Year Colleges
Abstract:
A three-year study tracking outcomes for approximately 3,000 students across California shows that career-focused dual enrollment programs can provide important benefits for those who are underachieving and underrepresented in higher education. Dual enrollment, which allows high school students to take college courses and earn college credit, was once geared primarily toward high-achieving students seeking greater academic challenge. The Concurrent Courses initiative comprised eight programs involving 10 colleges and 21 high schools across California. Among participating students, 60 percent were students of color and 40 percent came from non-English speaking homes. Extensive evaluation shows that program participants, compared with other students in their districts, were: (1) More likely to graduate from high school; (2) More likely to transition to a four-year college rather than a two-year college; (3) Less likely to take basic skills courses in college; (4) More likely to persist in postsecondary education; and (5) Accumulating more college credits. This paper presents program recommendations from the Concurrent Courses initiative. [For the main report, "Broadening the Benefits of Dual Enrollment: Reaching Underachieving and Underrepresented Students with Career-Focused Programs. Insight," see ED533756. For related report, "Dual Enrollment: Helping Make College a Reality for Students Less Likely to Go. Recommendations for Policymakers from the Concurrent Courses Initiative," see ED533753.]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (782K)
|
|