|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-04-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Educational Environment; Curriculum Development; High School Students; Student Attitudes; Biology; Science Interests; Science Laboratories; Scientific Attitudes; Science Instruction; Gifted; High Achievement; Age Differences; Introductory Courses; Elective Courses; Correlation; Comparative Analysis; Structural Equation Models
Abstract:
Science laboratory learning has been lauded for decades for its role in fostering positive student attitudes about science and developing students' interest in science and ability to use equipment. An expanding body of research has demonstrated the significant influence of laboratory environment on student learning. Further research has demonstrated differences in student perceptions based on giftedness. To explore the relationship between giftedness and students' perceptions of their learning environment, we examined students' perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in biology courses, including courses designated for high-achieving versus regular-achieving students. In addition, to explore the relationship between students' perceptions and the extent of their experience with laboratory learning in a particular discipline, we examined students' perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in first-year biology courses versus elective biology courses that require first-year biology as a prerequisite. We found that students in high-achieving courses had a more favourable perception of all aspects of their learning environment when compared with students in regular courses. In addition, student perceptions of their laboratory appeared to be influenced by the extent of their experience in learning science. Perceptions were consistent amongst regular- and high-achieving students regardless of grade level. In addition, perceptions of students in first year and beyond were consistent regardless of grade level. These findings have critical applications in curriculum development as well as in the classroom. Teachers can use student perceptions of their learning environment to emphasize critical pedagogical approaches and modify other areas that enable enhancement of the science laboratory learning environment.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-11-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Undergraduate Students; Student Attitudes; Definitions; Statistics; College Mathematics; Introductory Courses; Attitude Change; Mixed Methods Research; Pretests Posttests; Student Surveys; Content Analysis; Comparative Analysis
Abstract:
Although statistics education research has focused on students' learning and conceptual understanding of statistics, researchers have only recently begun investigating students' perceptions of statistics. The term perception describes the overlap between cognitive and non-cognitive factors. In this mixed-methods study, undergraduate students provided their perceptions of statistics and completed the "Survey of Students' Attitudes Toward Statistics-36" (SATS-36). The qualitative data suggest students had basic knowledge of what the word statistics meant, but with varying depths of understanding and conceptualization of statistics. Quantitative analysis also examined the relationship between students' perceptions of statistics and attitudes toward statistics. We found no significant difference in mean pre- or post-SATS scores across conceptualization and content knowledge categories. The implications of these findings for education and research are discussed. (Contains 6 tables and 6 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2011-07-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Nonmajors; Undergraduate Students; Self Efficacy; Incentives; Goal Orientation; Student Motivation; Measures (Individuals); Multiple Regression Analysis; Biology; Test Anxiety; Student Attitudes; Higher Education; Introductory Courses; Beliefs; Science Education; Science Instruction; Self Concept; Scientific Attitudes; Predictor Variables; Effect Size; Likert Scales
Abstract:
Undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory biology course for nonmajors during the fall semester of 2007 were administered the Biology Attitude Scale (Russell and Hollander 1975), a constructed Mathematics Attitude Scale, and a portion of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich and Smith 1993). Together, the instruments assessed attitudes toward biology and mathematics as well as various motivational constructs including self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, task value, control of learning beliefs, and test anxiety. Final course grades were also obtained. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the significant (p less than 0.05) predictors of course grade (R[superscript 2] = 0.362, n = 312) were self-efficacy (beta = 0.484), test anxiety (beta = -0.211), and math attitudes (beta = 0.094). No other variables contributed to the model. Further multiple regression analysis revealed that the best predictors of self-efficacy (R[superscript 2] = 0.665, n = 318) were biology attitudes (beta = 0.329), control of learning beliefs (beta = 0.280), test anxiety (beta = -0.249), intrinsic goal orientation (beta = 0.166), task value (beta = 0.147), and extrinsic goal orientation (beta = 0.119). Implications including strategies to improve course performance through fostering student motivation and building self-efficacy are discussed. (Contains 4 tables and 2 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-09-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Environmental Education; Large Group Instruction; Attitude Change; Outcomes of Education; Introductory Courses; Student Characteristics; Prior Learning; College Instruction; Nonmajors; Comparative Analysis; Correlation; Instructional Effectiveness; College Students
Abstract:
One critical tool for creating an environmentally literate citizenry is to reach students other than those in environmental-related majors in the form of the university-level large introductory environmental studies course. In this study, we relate student academic background to initial and final environmental awareness results. We found that students from a wide range of backgrounds begin with similar motivation for taking the class and uniformly low environmental knowledge. Our results indicate that a low-credit, engaging introductory environmental studies class can strongly impact student awareness independent of diverse learner academic backgrounds. For example, results suggest that students taking the course primarily to meet science breadth requirements and students with a strong previous science background had equivalent initial awareness and course outcomes. The lack of a correlation with background suggests that students are not learning about environmental studies in other classes and reinforces the importance of investing in nonmajors-focused environmental education. Additionally, our findings support the importance of affective learning gains, such as attitude changes, which we term "learning to care".
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|