|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Foreign Countries; Educational Policy; Higher Education; Consortia; Educational Cooperation; Educational Trends; International Education; Educational Technology; Influence of Technology; Technology Uses in Education; Handheld Devices; Computer System Design; Information Storage; Computer Interfaces; Online Courses; Distance Education; Computer Games; Web Based Instruction; Internet; Teleconferencing; Electronic Learning; Trend Analysis; Delphi Technique; Literature Reviews; Educational Research; Expertise; Web Sites; Postsecondary Education; Electronic Publishing; Advisory Committees; Information Management; Economic Factors; Data Analysis; Barriers; Resistance to Change; Learner Controlled Instruction; Open Universities
Abstract:
This paper reflects a multi-year collaborative effort between the New Media Consortium (NMC) and Griffith University to help inform Australian educational leaders about significant developments in technologies supporting teaching, learning, and research in tertiary education. The research underpinning the report makes use of the NMC's Delphi-based process for bringing groups of experts to a consensus viewpoint, in this case around the impact of emerging technologies on teaching, learning, research, or information management in Australian tertiary education over the next five years. This paper was produced to explore emerging technologies and forecast their potential impact expressly in an Australian context. In the effort that ran from February through April 2012, a carefully selected group of 41 experts behind this report considered hundreds of relevant articles, news, blog posts, research, and project examples as part of the preparation that ultimately pinpointed the most notable emerging technology topics, trends, and challenges for tertiary education in Australia over the next five years. That group of experts, known as the 2012 Horizon.au Advisory Board, is comprised of a body of knowledgeable individuals, all highly regarded in their fields; collectively the advisory board represents a range of diverse perspectives across the learning sector. [For "Technology Outlook for UK Tertiary Education 2011-2016: An NMC Horizon Report Regional Analysis," see ED532399.]
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (416K)
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-03-16 |
Pub Type(s): |
Books; Collected Works - General |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Foreign Countries; Distance Education; Instructional Design; Educational Technology; Educational Radio; Electronic Learning; Online Courses; Web Based Instruction; Blended Learning; Technology Integration; Online Searching; Computer Graphics; Internet; Computer Simulation; Higher Education; College Instruction; International Education; Instructional Development; Program Implementation; Case Studies; Research Reports; Comparative Analysis; Teacher Education; Educational Administration; Open Universities; Elementary School Teachers; Learning Activities; Student Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Goal Orientation; Beliefs; Conventional Instruction; Low Income Groups; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Academic Education; Educational Strategies; Self Efficacy; Lifelong Learning; Engineering Education; Architectural Education; Architectural Research
Abstract:
This book, written by authors representing 12 countries and five continents, is a collection of international perspectives on distance learning and distance learning implementations in higher education. The perspectives are presented in the form of practical case studies of distance learning implementations, research studies on teaching and learning in distance learning environments, and conceptual and theoretical frameworks for designing and developing distance learning tools, courses and programs. The book will appeal to distance learning practitioners, researchers, and higher education administrators. To address the different needs and interests of audience members, the book is organized into five sections: Distance Education Management, Distance Education and Teacher Development, Distance Learning Pedagogy, Distance Learning Students, and Distance Learning Educational Tools. Contents include: (1) Re-Engineering Open and Distance Learning Institutional Development for Knowledge Society in Africa (K. O. Ojokheta); (2) Distance Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Conceptual Model (Mehran Farajollahi and Nahid Zarifsanaee); (3) Open and Distance Learning in Dual Mode Universities: A Treasure Unexploited (Paul Birevu Muyinda); (4) Teacher Development Through Distance Education: Contrasting Visions of Radio Learning in South African Primary Schools (Charles Potter and Gordon Naidoo); (5) Open and Distance Learning for Teachers' Professional Development: The English in Action (EIA) Model for the Global South (M. Mahruf C. Shohel); (6) Self-Regulated Learning Activities: Supporting Success in Online Courses (Maureen Snow Andrade); (7) Strategically Integrating Blended Learning to Deliver Lifelong Learning (John Wall); (8) Distance Learning: Modern Approaches to Engineering Education (Boris Kruk and Olga Zhuravleva); (9) Assessment Methods of Student Learning in Web-Based Distance Courses: A Case Study (Jon R. Hufford); (10) An Analysis of the Search Skills of Online Graduate Students as the Basis for the Development of Appropriate Instructional Strategies (Olabisi Kuboni); (11) The Role of Self-Efficacy, Control Beliefs and Achievement Goals on Learning Among Distance Learners (Clarence Ng); (12) Differences and Similarities in Approach Between Classroom and Distance Learning (Ingrid Helleve); (13) Distance Learning and the Low-Income Student (Angela Benson, Joi L. Moore, Nicole Norfles and Carolyn Starkey); (14) Web-Application for Engineering Graphics--An Example of a Distance Learning Tool (Lourdes Rubio and Belen Munoz-Abella); and (15) Internet-Supported Multi-User Virtual and Physical Prototypes for Architectural Academic Education and Research (Henriette H. Bier).
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Hill, Phil |
Source: |
EDUCAUSE Review, v47 n6 p84-86, 88, 90, 92, 94-97 Nov-Dec 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Higher Education; Distance Education; Internet; Online Courses; Electronic Learning; Educational Technology; Partnerships in Education; Outcomes of Education; Large Group Instruction; Class Size; Video Technology; Electronic Publishing; Web Sites; Mathematics; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematics Education; Web Based Instruction
Abstract:
Although there has been a long history of distance education, the creation of online education occurred just over a decade and a half ago--a relatively short time in academic terms. Early course delivery via the web had started by 1994, soon followed by a more structured approach using the new category of course management systems. Since that time, online education has slowly but steadily grown in popularity, to the point that in the fall of 2010, almost one-third of U.S. postsecondary students were taking at least one course on line. Fast forward to 2012: a new concept called Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is generating widespread interest in higher education circles. Most significantly, it has opened up strategic discussions in higher education cabinets and boardrooms about online education. Stanford, MIT, Harvard, the University of California-Berkeley, and others have thrown their support--in terms of investment, resources, and presidential backing--behind the transformative power of MOOCs and online education. As educators continue to discuss important issues such as access, affordability, and personalized learning in higher education, they would be helped by having a richer understanding of the changes that are already occurring. In this article, the author offers a descriptive view of the emerging landscape of online educational delivery models can lead to a richer understanding for the continuing discussion of issues such as access, affordability, and personalized learning in higher education. (Contains 3 figures and 19 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Electronic Learning; Allied Health Occupations Education; Educational Research; Online Courses; Doctoral Programs; Correlation; Educational Technology; Anxiety; Student Attitudes; Graduate Students; Attitude Measures; Attitude Change; Course Evaluation; Satisfaction; Distance Education; Web Based Instruction; Pretests Posttests; Student Surveys; College Instruction; Computer Attitudes; Internet
Abstract:
Eighty-four students in an online health education doctoral program taking the first course in the program over one year (four quarters) were surveyed in regards to their computer, Internet, and online course anxiety, and overall course satisfaction. An 18-item anxiety tool with domains in computer, Internet, and online learning was administered in the first and last weeks of an educational research course to assess for changes in student anxiety. A 24-item satisfaction tool with domains regarding the instructor, technology, setup, interaction, outcomes, and overall satisfaction was administered at the end of the course. Results show a significant negative correlation between anxiety and student satisfaction. Student anxiety levels were in the relatively moderate range; changes in anxiety levels over time were not significant. Participants who felt anxious when using computers or the Internet, or when taking online courses experienced anxiety with other domains. (Contains 6 tables and 3 figures.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Books; Collected Works - General |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Higher Education; Educational Environment; School Holding Power; Interpersonal Relationship; Foreign Countries; Electronic Learning; Distance Education; Online Courses; Web Sites; Electronic Publishing; Social Networks; Internet; Web 2.0 Technologies; Student Motivation; Teacher Student Relationship; Story Telling; Educational Technology; Vocational Education; Communities of Practice; Nonformal Education; Marketing; Public Relations; Computer Mediated Communication; Media Literacy; Architecture; Computer Oriented Programs
Abstract:
As web applications play a vital role in our society, social media has emerged as an important tool in the creation and exchange of user-generated content and social interaction. The benefits of these services have entered in the educational areas to become new means by which scholars communicate, collaborate and teach. Social Media and the New Academic Environment: Pedagogical Challenges provides relevant theoretical frameworks and the latest research on social media the challenges in the educational context. This book is essential for professionals aiming to improve their understanding of social media at different levels of education as well as researchers in the fields of e-learning, educational science and information and communication sciences and much more. Contents include: (1) Future Learning Spaces: The Potential and Practice of Learning 2.0 in Higher Education (Charlotte Holland and Miriam Judge); (2) How Social Design Influences Student Retention and Self-Motivation in Online Learning Environments (Derek E. Baird and Mercedes Fisher); (3) Student-Faculty Communication on Facebook: Prospective Learning Enhancement and Boundaries (Laurentiu Soitu and Laura Paulet-Crainiceanu); (4) Integrating Mobile Learning, Digital Storytelling and Social Media in Vocational Learning (Miikka Eriksson, Pauliina Tuomi, and Hanna Vuojarvi); (5) Enhancing Social Presence and Communities of Practice in Distance Education Courses through Social Media (Lori B. Holcomb and Matthew Kruger-Ross); (6) Framing Non-Formal Education through CSR 2.0 (Bogdan Patrut, Monica Patrut, and Camelia Cmeciu); (7) Social Media Audit and Analytics: Exercises for Marketing and Public Relations Courses (Ana Adi); (8) Functions of Social Media in Higher Education: A Case Study (Violeta Maria Serbu); (9) A User's Perspective on Academic Blogging: Case Study on a Romanian Group of Students (Mihai Deac and Ioan Hosu); (10) Uses and Implementation of Social Media at University: The Case of Schools of Communication in Spain (Maria-Jesus Diaz-Gonzalez, Natalia Quintas Froufe, Almudena Gonzalez del Valle Brena, and Francesc Pumarola); (11) Web Use in Public Relations Education: A Portuguese Example (Sonia Pedro Sebastiao); (12) Social Media Usage among University Students in Malaysia (Norsiah Abdul Hamid, Mohd Sobhi Ishak, Syamsul Anuar Ismail, and Siti Syamsul Nurin Mohmad Yazam); (13) Social Media and other Web 2.0 Technologies as Communication Channels in a Cross-Cultural, Web-Based Professional Communication Project (Pavel Zemliansky and Olena Goroshko); (14) E-Learning Records: Are There Any to Manage? If so, How? (Luciana Duranti and Elizabeth Shaffer); (15) The Influence of Twitter on the Academic Environment (Martin Ebner); (16) Academic Perspectives on Microblogging (Gabriela Grosseck, Carmen Holotescu and Bogdan Patrut); (17) The Impact of Social Media on Scholarly Practices in Higher Education: Online Engagement and ICTs Appropriation in Senior, Young, and Doctoral Researchers (Antonella Esposito); (18) Digital Literacy for Effective Communication in the New Academic Environment: The Educational Blogs (Ruxandra Vasilescu, Manuela Epure and Nadia Florea); (19) Implementation of Augmented Reality in "3.0 Learning" Methodology: Case Studies with Students of Architecture Degree (Ernest Redondo, Isidro Navarro, Albert Sanchez and David Fonseca); and (20) Digital Social Media Detox (DSMD): Responding to a Culture of Interconnectivity (Theresa Renee White).
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|