|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-05-29 |
Pub Type(s): |
Reports - Evaluative |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Physical Education; Guidelines; Track and Field; Exercise Physiology; Athletic Coaches
Abstract:
Accurate quantification of training intensity is an essential component of a training program (Rowbottom, 2000). A training program designed to optimize athlete performance abilities cannot be practically planned or implemented without a valid and reliable indication of training intensity and its effect on the physiological mechanisms of the human body (Olbrecht, 2001; Rowbottom, 2000). Additionally, for sport coaches to make evidence-based changes in the training process, or assess an athlete's physiologic response to a training prescription, valid and reliable measures of training intensity must be used (Olbrecht, 2001; Rowbottom, 2000). This study developed and field tested a standardized system of training intensity guidelines for the sports of track and field/cross-country, modeled after the standardized system of training intensity guidelines developed, adopted, and in use by U.S.A. Swimming; and explored track and field and cross-country coaches' receptivity to, and perceived utility of, the guidelines developed. This paper: (a) reviews the training intensity guidelines developed, inclusive of the associated physiologic metrics validated in the study; (b) describes a seasonal application of the guidelines; and (c) concludes with supporting commentary from the teacher/coaches interviewed in the study; all of whom uniformly confirmed the utility and applicability of the guidelines. (Contains 1 figure and 1 table.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
ERIC
Full Text (432K)
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-10-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Physical Activities; Foreign Countries; Childrens Rights; Public Policy; Athletics; Conflict; Cooperation; Competition; Burnout; Ideology; Guidelines; Team Sports; Case Studies
Abstract:
The focus of this article is on the organization of children's sport in Norway. More specifically, the paper sets out to examine (i) the changing pattern of relationships, and in particular the changing balance of conflict and cooperation, between the several organizations with responsibility for children's sport, and (ii) how sport for children is regulated in order to protect children against the dangers associated with competitive pressures, overspecialization and burnout. These questions are answered by tracing the key policy changes and initiatives in relation to children's sport. With reference to the organization of children's sport, the ideological struggles between schools and sport organizations over the nature and objectives of sport and physical activity are traced from the 1950s through to recent attempts to promote an Active Sports policy, which represent possible partnerships between several governmental ministries (culture, health and education), schools, and sport clubs. With reference to protecting children against competitive pressures and early overspecialization, the article traces the development from the first advisory guidelines for children's sporting participation through to mandatory regulations and finally to the recognition of children's rights in sport. (Contains 3 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2010-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Books; Collected Works - General |
Peer Reviewed: |
|
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Track and Field; Team Sports; Mathematical Concepts; Probability; Mathematics Instruction; Play; Racquet Sports; Athletics; Journal Articles; College Athletics; Teaching Methods; Computation; Physics; Creative Teaching
Abstract:
"Mathematics and Sports", edited by Joseph A. Gallian, gathers 25 articles that illuminate the power and role of mathematics in the worlds of professional and recreational play. Divided into sections by the kind of sports, the book offers source materials for classroom use and student projects. Readers will encounter mathematical ideas from an eclectic group of writers, including undergraduate students, graduate students, and professional mathematicians. Following a preface, this book contains: (I) Baseball: (1) Sabremetrics: The Past, the Present, and the Future (Jim Albert); (2) Surprising Streaks and Playoff Parity: Probability Problems in a Sports Context (Rick Cleary); (3) Did Humidifying the Baseball Decrease the Number of Homers at Coors Field? (Howard Penn); (4) Streaking: Finding the Probability for a Batting Streak (Stanley Rothman and Quoc Le); (II) Basketball: (5) Bracketology: How can math help? (Tim Chartier, Erich Kreutzer, Amy Langville, and Kathryn Pedings); (6) Down 4 with a Minute to Go (G. Edgar Parker); (7) Jump Shot Mathematics (Howard Penn); (III) Football: (8) How Deep Is Your Playbook? (Tricia Muldoon Brown and Eric B. Kahn); (9) A Look at Overtime in the NFL (Chris Jones); (10) Extending the Colley Method to Generate Predictive Football Rankings (R. Drew Pasteur); (11) When Perfect Isn't Good Enough: Retrodictive Rankings in College Football (R. Drew Pasteur); (IV) Golf: (12) The Science of a Drive (Douglas N. Arnold); (13) Is Tiger Woods a Winner? (Scott M. Berry); (14) G. H. Hardy's Golfing Adventure (Roland Minton); (15) Tigermetrics (Roland Minton); (V) NASCAR: (16) Can Mathematics Make a Difference? Exploring Tire Troubles in NASCAR (Cheryll E. Crowe); (VI) Scheduling: (17) Scheduling a Tournament (Dalibor Froncek); (VII) Soccer: (18) Bending a Soccer Ball with Math (Tim Chartier); (VIII) Tennis: (19) Teaching Mathematics and Statistics Using Tennis (Reza Noubary); (20) Peentage Play in Tennis (G. Edgar Parker); and (IX) Track and Field: (21) The Effects of Wind and Altitude in the 400m Sprint with Various IAAF Track Geometries (Vanessa Alday and Michael Frantz); (23) What is the Speed Limit for Men's 100 Meter Dash? (Reza Noubary); (24) May the Best Team Win: Determining the Winner of a Cross Country Race (Stephen Szydlik); (25) Biomechanics of Running and Walking (Anthony Tongen and Roshna E. Wunderlich).
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-12-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Human Body; Physical Activities; Training; Track and Field; Males; Athletes; Exercise Physiology; Biomechanics; Comparative Analysis; Foreign Countries
Abstract:
Our purpose was to compare the effect of a periodized preparation consisting of power endurance training and high-intensity power training on the contractile properties of the quadriceps muscle and functional performances in well trained male sprinters (n = 7). After 4 weeks of high-intensity power training, 60-m sprint running time improved by an average of 1.83% (SD = 0.96; p less than 0.05). This improvement was inversely related to an increase in maximal voluntary contraction torque (r = -0.89, p less than 0.05) and poorly correlated with changes in the contractile kinetics of the quadriceps muscle (r range from 0.36 to -0.46). These findings suggest that sprint performance is poorly predicted by muscle intrinsic properties and that a neural adaptation appears to explain most of the observed functional adaptations. (Contains 2 tables and 1 figure.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2009-09-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Track and Field; Aquatic Sports; Athletes; Age Differences; Adolescents; Team Sports; Athletics; Motivation; Aging (Individuals); Age Groups; Adults; Effect Size
Abstract:
The relative age effect refers to the performance-related advantage of being born early in a cohort or selection year. Until recently it was unknown whether the relative age effect generalizes across the lifespan. Medic, Starkes, and Young (2007) reasoned that the 5-year age categories that are widely used in masters-level sports to organize competitions and award prizes might be used to examine whether a relative age effect exists in older sports populations beyond the age of 35 years. Given the preliminary nature of Medic et al.'s (2007) results, along with their acknowledgment that those results "might not be generalizable to masters athletes from sports other than swimming and track and field or to masters athletes from countries other than the United States" (p. 1383), one purpose of this study was to determine if Medic et al.'s (2007) relative age effect findings can be replicated with world-class masters swimmers and track and field athletes from different countries. The second purpose of this study was to determine if a relative age effect exists in previously unexamined sports, such as masters weightlifting and rowing. The results of this study indicated that a relative age effect exists in masters swimming and track and field, but not in masters weightlifting and rowing, suggesting that this effect depends on the sport in which masters-level athletes compete. In particular, the authors' findings showed that the likelihood of participating in the world-level masters swimming competition is higher for individuals in the first year of an age category. (Contains 2 tables and 1 figure.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Classroom Techniques; Track and Field; Aquatic Sports; Prediction; Interaction; Human Body; Physical Activities; Physical Education; Physical Activity Level; Research; Data Analysis; Models
Abstract:
The conductors of this study reviewed prediction research and studied the accomplishments and compromises in predicting world records and best performances in track and field and swimming. The results of the study showed that prediction research only promises to describe the historical trends in track and field and swimming performances, to study the limits of human body based on current data, to examine factors that affect human's running, jumping, throwing, and swimming, and to understand the characteristics of human beings. Prediction research cannot accurately predict new world records and future best performances. In the future, prediction research should become an integrated research field consisting of different specialty areas. Researchers need to develop a better model in which random variables could be separated out as independent variables in order to reflect the complex interaction effects and to understand the nature, characteristics, and limitations of humans using world record/best performance data.
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|