|
|
Pub Date: |
2011-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Change Strategies; Higher Education; Feminism; Equal Opportunities (Jobs); Females; Sexual Orientation; Sex Fairness; Gender Discrimination; Gender Bias; Womens Education; Womens Studies; Social Justice; Disproportionate Representation; Barriers; Socioeconomic Status; Social Theories; Public Policy; Access to Education; Educational Opportunities; Women Administrators; Women Faculty; Enrollment Rate; Graduation Rate
Abstract:
This monograph emerges from the premise that discrimination on the basis of one's sex, gender, race, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, disability, religion, or ethnicity is harmful to advancing a civil society where all citizens have opportunities to contribute to their fullest potential. The chapters included in this monograph are intended to both review the current scholarship about women's status in higher education and provide readers with multiple lenses through which to make meaning of that scholarship and its implications for changing the status quo. The chapter "Framing Women's Status Through Multiple Lenses" delineates diverse feminist theories as frames for understanding equity and analyzing strategies to advance women's status. The two chapters, "Examining Women's Status: Access and Representation as Key Equity Indicators" and "Examining Women's Status: Campus Climate and Gender Equity," provide an overview of the current literature about gender equity in higher education. The focus in "Examining Women's Status: Access and Representation as Key Equity Indicators" is access and representation; "access" is defined in terms of gatekeeping (gaining entry to institutions of higher education), and "representation" refers to "where" women are located or positioned once they have gained access to the institution as students, faculty, staff, or administrators. The chapter takes a closer look at the phenomenon of "the higher the fewer" for women in terms of their representation relative to occupational segregation and prestige hierarchies in and across institutions. Representation also refers to gaining access to particular institutional arenas like athletics, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, senior leadership roles, and senior faculty as well as the representation of women in different types of postsecondary institutions. "Examining Women's Status: Campus Climate and Gender Equity" shifts from describing numbers and locations of women in various higher education arenas to describing the experiences of women in different roles and contexts within postsecondary institutions. This emphasis is captured by the word "climate"--generally defined as "common member perceptions, assumptions, beliefs, feelings or attitudes" about organizational life. The chapter "Advancing Women's Status: Analyzing Predominant Change Strategies" shines the spotlight on change making by providing a review of the literature related to predominant strategies for advancing gender equity in the context of higher education. The chapter examines strategies through multiple lenses of feminist theory to help make embedded assumptions more explicit and examine ways in which these assumptions serve to shape and constrain the range of possible solutions to the problem of inequity. The final chapter, "Implications and Recommendations," includes recommendations for further research and a brief discussion of the implications of drawing on multiple lenses to analyze equity. (Contains 3 exhibits, 6 figures and name and subject indexes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Allaf, Carine |
Source: |
Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, v14 n1 p67-89 2012-2013 |
|
Pub Date: |
2013-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Higher Education; Females; Foreign Countries; Sex Fairness; Admission (School); School Holding Power; Academic Persistence; School Choice; Womens Education; Gender Bias; Equal Education; College Students; Gender Differences; Interviews; Enrollment Trends; Graduation Rate; Cultural Influences
Abstract:
Jordan is viewed as a country of social, political, and economic and advancement. It currently leads the region in literacy rates and is well on its way to achieving gender equity. However, some reports claim that Jordan maintains the widest gender gap in higher education completion in the region while others report that the percentage of females is higher than males. There is a body of literature on college student retention but no such work has taken place in the Middle East, and more specifically in Jordan, on the experiences of women in higher education and retention. This study explores the experiences of 18 women that, at the time of the data collection (2008-2009), were in their final year or semester of higher education and preparing to graduate (average age 22.3 years old) and 10 women, that were at one point formally enrolled but at the time of the study had departed from completing higher education (average age 22.8 years old). These women represented 13 different universities (7 public and 6 private) throughout Jordan. Interviews were conducted with each participant. In addition to interviews, visits with the women were conducted on the university campus and official university and ministry education records were collected to examine enrollment, graduation, and retention rates. These varied qualitative methods allowed for a holistic exploration of the patterns in the persistence of women in higher education. This study found that the main retention theories formed in the United States are not completely adequate in helping explain the situation of women in Jordan and this study alters and extends them, placing more weight on characteristics at the individual-level, rather than on the institutional-level, with more attention paid to the role of the commute and the inflexibility of the higher education admissions process, in order to make them more applicable to the context of women in Jordan. (Contains 1 figure, 2 tables, and 9 footnotes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Horsford, Sonya Douglass |
Source: |
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), v25 n1 p11-22 2012 |
|
Pub Date: |
2012-00-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Opinion Papers |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Social Justice; Females; Womens Education; Womens Studies; Women Administrators; Black Studies; Essays; Feminism; Racial Integration; Racial Relations; Gender Differences; Social Class; Leadership Role; Leadership Styles; Interpersonal Competence; Literature Reviews; Cultural Pluralism; Low Income Groups; Ethnic Diversity
Abstract:
The purpose of this essay is to contextualize the existing research literature on leadership for diversity, equity, and social justice in education with "bridge leadership" as historically practiced by Black women leaders in the USA. Its primary aim is to demonstrate how the intersection of race and gender as experienced by the Black woman leader has, in many instances, resulted in her serving as a bridge for others, to others, and between others in multiple and often complicated contexts over time. Framed by a discussion of Black feminisms, this project centers the intersectionality of race and gender identities alongside context as important indicators in the development of leadership philosophies, epistemologies, and practice. It concludes with how and why bridge leadership can serve as an effective model for leading diverse school communities where race and class divides continue to stifle learning opportunities for large numbers of poor, Black, Latino, and immigrant children and youth in the USA. (Contains 1 note.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
Author(s): |
Smith, Joan M. |
Source: |
Educational Management Administration & Leadership, v39 n5 p516-535 Sep 2011 |
|
Pub Date: |
2011-09-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Females; Secondary School Teachers; Women Administrators; Instructional Leadership; Principals; Interviews; Womens Education; Womens Studies; Occupational Aspiration; Phenomenology; Administrator Attitudes; Teacher Attitudes; Foreign Countries; Career Development; Feminism; Work Attitudes
Abstract:
This article reports on some of the findings of a wider, life history study of the factors affecting the career decisions of 40 female secondary school teachers, including 10 female headteachers. As a part of this, insights were sought into why women continue to be proportionally under-represented in secondary headship posts in UK secondary schools. Interview evidence indicated that the majority of female teachers in the study harboured a set of negative perceptions of school leadership and rejected headship as a career option. In this article, I contrast these negative perceptions with the positive picture of headship painted by the female headteachers. The headteachers in this study were driven by a strong sense of values relating to pupil achievement, and saw themselves as agents of change who needed to occupy positions of power in order to enact their principles to maximum effect. Drawing on the narratives of the 10 headteachers, I discuss their positive, agentic perspectives on school leadership, underpinned by essentially child-centred values. I argue that a more proactive approach to promoting this positive view of school leadership may be key to encouraging women (and presumably some men) who have previously rejected headship as a career, to reconsider. (Contains 3 tables.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|
|
Pub Date: |
2013-03-00 |
Pub Type(s): |
Journal Articles; Reports - Research |
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes |
|
|
|
Descriptors:
Females; Educational Policy; Equal Education; Sex Fairness; Discourse Analysis; Gender Issues; International Organizations; Feminism; Empowerment; Justice; Gender Differences; Social Differences
Abstract:
Girls' education has been a focus of international development policy for several decades. The discursive framing of international organizations' policy initiatives relating to girls' education, however, limits the potential for discussing complex gender issues that affect the possibilities for gender equity. Because discourse shapes our understanding of reality, the emphases and omissions of policy language can affect our understanding of complex issues such as the challenges of girls' education in international development. Using feminist critical policy discourse analysis, this study analyzes 300 policy documents, published between 1995 and 2008, that represent the "public face" of 14 organizations active in the field of international development education. We examine three types of discursive arguments given in the documents for educating girls: justice arguments, utility arguments, and empowerment arguments. We show that the robustness of "gender", and related concepts such as equity and equality as theoretical constructs, are limited, which is a factor constraining what can be understood as important in gender equity in education. Policy remains focused on girls and not gender (or boys), and on easily measurable indicators (counting boys and girls in school). This policy discourse does little to recognize that gender as a social process reproduces--or has the potential to challenge--social inequities. (Contains 1 table and 5 notes.)
Note:The following two links
are not-applicable for text-based browsers or screen-reading software.
Show
Hide
Full Abstract
Related Items: Show Related Items
Full-Text Availability Options:
More Info:
Help |
Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
|
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
|
Publisher's website
|
|