Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

EJ960078 - At-Risk Learner Preference in Engineering/Technical Graphics: An Exploratory Study

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ960078
Title:At-Risk Learner Preference in Engineering/Technical Graphics: An Exploratory Study
Authors:Ernst, Jeremy V.
Descriptors:Vocational EducationAt Risk StudentsHigh School StudentsCognitive StyleEngineering EducationQuestionnairesDifferences
Source:Engineering Design Graphics Journal, v75 n3 p7-18 Fall 2011
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:Engineering Design Graphics Division, American Society for Engineering Education. 1818 N Street NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-331-3500; Web site: http://www.edgj.org/index.php/EDGJ
Publication Date:2011-00-00
Pages:12
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Abstract:This exploratory study investigated learner preferences of secondary Career and Technical Education (CTE) Engineering/Technical Graphics students using the VARK Questionnaire. The VARK Questionnaire is an instrument that assists in determining students' dominant preferred learning styles, whether visual, aural, reading, or kinesthetic. This study identifies learner preferences of high school student participants and examines learner preference differences among at-risk students and students not categorized as at-risk. Results of this study highlight an identifiable preference toward kinesthetic learning for at-risk and not at-risk participants. Through statistical evaluation and analysis, common learner preferences among at-risk participants and not at-risk participants were identified. Results and findings of this study present the possibility that instruction, practice, and implementation can be uniformly addressed in CTE Engineering/Technical Graphics while maintaining favored means of learning for at-risk and not at-risk students alike. (Contains 5 tables.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:27

Note:N/A
Identifiers:North Carolina
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0046-2012
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:High Schools; Secondary Education
Direct Link:http://www.edgj.org/index.php/EDGJ/article/view/267
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский