Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

ED537159 - Seeking Accountability through State-Appointed Emergency District Management. Working Paper #28

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

PDF ERIC Full Text (621K)

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:ED537159
Title:Seeking Accountability through State-Appointed Emergency District Management. Working Paper #28
Authors:Arsen, DavidMason, Mary L.
Descriptors:AccountabilitySchool DistrictsState ActionState LegislationState RegulationPolicy AnalysisState PolicyState GovernmentCase StudiesEducational HistoryIntellectual HistoryPolitics of EducationSchool AdministrationSchool AccountingAudits (Verification)
Source:Education Policy Center, Michigan State University
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Publisher:Education Policy Center. Michigan State University, 201 Erickson Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824-1034. Tel: 517-355-4494; Fax: 517-432-6202; e-mail: EPC@msu.edu; Web site: http://www.epc.msu.edu
Publication Date:2012-10-24
Pages:38
Pub Types:Reports - Evaluative
Abstract:Michigan's Local Government and School District Accountability Act of 2011 empowers the governor to appoint emergency managers (EMs) in financially-troubled school districts. EMs assume all powers of the superintendent and school board. They can reshape academic programs, nullify labor contracts, and open and close schools. This paper analyzes the law's political origins and early implementation. Relative to prevailing accountability mechanisms applicable to all school districts, in what respects are EM districts are more accountable, and in what respects are they less accountable? Our analysis reveals that although the law concentrates control over school operations, it weakens most standard dimensions of district accountability. (Contains 15 footnotes. Work for this article was supported in part by the Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:74

Note:N/A
Identifiers:Michigan
Record Type:Non-Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:Michigan State University, Education Policy Center
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:N/A
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Elementary Secondary Education
Direct Link:
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский