Alert:

Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

EJ873768 - Beyond Space and across Time: Non-Finalized Dialogue about Science and Religion Discourse

Help

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help With This Page

Back to Search Results Help Permalink Share this record

More Info:
Help 0 items in My Clipboard | Add record to My Clipboard

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial Help Finding Full Text | More Info:
Help Find in a Library | Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:	EJ873768
Title:	Beyond Space and across Time: Non-Finalized Dialogue about Science and Religion Discourse
Authors:	Hsu, Pei-Ling
Descriptors:	Constructivism (Learning); Persuasive Discourse; Databases; Religion; Sciences; Scientific Concepts; Epistemology; Learning Processes; Religious Factors; Role of Religion; World Views; Scientific Enterprise; Science Education; Science Instruction; Evolution; Controversial Issues (Course Content); Educational Environment; Discourse Analysis
Source:	Cultural Studies of Science Education, v5 n1 p201-212 Mar 2010
More Info: Help Peer Reviewed:	Yes
Publisher:	Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Publication Date:	2010-03-00
Pages:	12
Pub Types:	Journal Articles; Opinion Papers
Abstract:	This commentary dialogues with three articles that analyze the same database about science and religion discourse produced 17 years ago. Dialogues in these three articles and this commentary across space and time allow us to develop new and different understandings of the same database and situation. As part of this commentary, I discuss topics approached in the three articles including the collective nature of discourses, emotion, and constructivist view on learning. I draw on three essential concepts of "the dialogical nature of utterance", "the emotional-volitional tone" and "internally persuasive discourse" informed by Bakhtin's dialogism. In particular, I conclude that Bakhtin's dialogism not only invites us to understand science learning discourse in a more holistic way but also encourages us to open up dialogues between science and religion that often are considered to be two hostile opponents.
Abstractor:	As Provided
Reference Count:	0

Note:	N/A
Identifiers:	N/A
Record Type:	Journal
Level:	N/A
Institutions:	N/A
Sponsors:	N/A
ISBN:	N/A
ISSN:	ISSN-1871-1502
Audiences:	N/A
Languages:	English
Education Level:	N/A
Direct Link:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9225-2

Back to Search Results