Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

EJ957291 - Flexible Response: Executive Federalism and the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ957291
Title:Flexible Response: Executive Federalism and the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
Authors:Shelly, Bryan
Descriptors:Federal LegislationFederal GovernmentAccountabilityEducational PolicyChange StrategiesEducational ChangeBenchmarkingPolitics of EducationState GovernmentGovernment RoleFederal RegulationPerformance FactorsStatistical AnalysisPredictor VariablesStatistical DataPopulation DistributionStatistical DistributionsFederal State RelationshipCompliance (Legal)
Source:Educational Policy, v26 n1 p117-135 Jan 2012
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Publication Date:2012-01-00
Pages:19
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Abstract:The federal government promised that it would limit waiver grants to states for the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). It largely kept that promise, but states did gain significant flexibility through amendments to accountability plans. OLS model estimates showed that larger, more affluent, and more Republican states submitted more amendment requests and the federal Department of Education approved the amendments of states that received more federal funding, had a more developed standardized testing system in place prior to NCLB, and voted Republican. These findings suggested new avenues of exploration for scholars of executive federalism. (Contains 8 notes and 3 tables.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:38

Note:N/A
Identifiers:No Child Left Behind Act 2001
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0895-9048
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Elementary Secondary Education
Direct Link:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904811425912
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский