Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

EJ981331 - Engaging Parents in Parentline Plus' Time to Talk Community Programme as Part of England's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy: Lessons for Policy and Practice

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ981331
Title:Engaging Parents in Parentline Plus' Time to Talk Community Programme as Part of England's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy: Lessons for Policy and Practice
Authors:Cullen, Mairi AnnDavis, LizLindsay, GeoffDavis, Hilton
Descriptors:PregnancyProfessional PersonnelForeign CountriesCommunity DevelopmentParent ParticipationInterviewsProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchTrust (Psychology)Parent AttitudesProgram ImplementationPublic PolicyEarly ParenthoodAdolescentsPrevention
Source:Children & Society, v26 n6 p443-455 Nov 2012
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/
Publication Date:2012-11-00
Pages:13
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Abstract:Based on 65 interviews with professionals and parents conducted during 2007-2008, this 16-month, mainly qualitative evaluation of Parentline Plus' Time to Talk Community Programme (a preventative initiative within England's teenage pregnancy strategy) found that a community development approach and an ethos of partnership with parents and professionals facilitated engagement. Respectful and realistic implementation involved skilled workers building relationships of trust. By consulting with other professionals and parents it was possible to establish local need and to build on existing provision. Initially, insufficient prior local consultation and negotiation created perceptions of an imposed initiative, led by outsiders, resulting in wary local parents and professionals. The engagement and evaluation processes are considered in relation to the short-term nature of the initiative and potential conflicts between responding flexibly to the needs of parents and delivering targeted programmes. (Contains 1 table and 1 note.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:40

Note:N/A
Identifiers:England
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0951-0605
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:N/A
Direct Link:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00350.x
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский