Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

EJ972261 - Verbal Learning and Memory Functions in Adolescents with Reading Disabilities

Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results  permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ972261
Title:Verbal Learning and Memory Functions in Adolescents with Reading Disabilities
Authors:Oyler, James D.Obrzut, John E.Asbjornsen, Arve E.
Descriptors:Verbal LearningMemorizationReading DifficultiesAdolescentsIntelligence TestsControl GroupsPhoneticsSemanticsMemorySemioticsRecall (Psychology)CuesRetention (Psychology)Word ListsStatistical AnalysisLearning DisabilitiesArticulation ImpairmentsEffect Size
Source:Learning Disability Quarterly, v35 n3 p184-195 Aug 2012
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Publication Date:2012-08-00
Pages:12
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:The authors of this current study compared the memory performance of adolescent students with specific reading disabilities (RD) with that of typical adolescent readers on a newly developed verbal learning test, the "Bergen-Tucson Verbal Learning Test" (BTVLT). This multiple trial test was designed to measure memory acquisition, retention, retrieval, and forgetting rates, as well as the ability to organize and retrieve the information from memory according to the phonological (surface) and semantic (lexical) features of words. A total of 20 participants with RD and 20 control participants (mean age = 15.2 years) were matched for age, gender, and ethnicity. Results indicated that the RD group learned significantly fewer list items and did so at a slower rate than the control group. Although the participants with RD were equally able to retain information once learned, they did demonstrate inefficient elaborative rehearsal strategies. They also recalled fewer words in both the semantic and phonetic cued-recall conditions, but the effect size was significantly greater in the latter. Taken together, the data suggest that students with RD have less efficient rehearsal and encoding mechanisms but typical retention. Retrieval also appears typical except under conditions that require information to be recalled based on phonetic codes. (Contains 6 tables and 2 figures.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:53

Note:N/A
Identifiers:Arizona
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0731-9487
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:N/A
Direct Link:http://intl-ldq.sagepub.com/content/35/3/184.abstract
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский