Alert:

Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

ED521078 - Federal and State Roles and Capacity for Improving Schools. Technical Report

Help

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help With This Page

Back to Search Results Help Permalink Share this record

More Info:
Help 0 items in My Clipboard | Add record to My Clipboard

Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial Help Finding Full Text | Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:	ED521078
Title:	Federal and State Roles and Capacity for Improving Schools. Technical Report
Authors:	Gottfried, Michael A.; Stecher, Brian M.; Hoover, Matthew; Cross, Amanda Brown
Descriptors:	School Restructuring; Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Legislation; Educational Change; Research Reports; Position Papers; Literature Reviews; Government Role; State Federal Aid; Responsibility; Educational Improvement; Educational Policy; Political Influences; Federal Programs; State Programs; Change Strategies; Educational Legislation; Program Effectiveness
Source:	RAND Corporation
More Info: Help Peer Reviewed:
Publisher:	RAND Corporation. P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138. Tel: 877-584-8642; Tel: 310-451-7002; Fax: 412-802-4981; e-mail: order@rand.org; Web site: http://www.rand.org
Publication Date:	2011-00-00
Pages:	52
Pub Types:	Information Analyses
Abstract:	U.S. educators and policymakers are concerned about the poor performance of the public schools, particularly schools that serve students from low-income families. Although education is primarily a state function, the federal government also has a longstanding interest in improving education for disadvantaged students, and it targets funding to this group. Federal involvement in states' provision of education has grown since the passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) in 1965, and the 2002 reauthorization of ESEA, known as No Child Left Behind, represented a significant increase in federal intervention, particularly in terms of school improvement. ESEA could be reauthorized in 2011, and there is much discussion about the most-effective way to balance federal and state responsibilities for improving schools and how best to frame federal policy to promote this goal. This report reviews the literature on the state and federal roles in education, examines the effectiveness of states' ongoing school-improvement efforts, and considers options for framing future federal guidance and support of state school-reform efforts. Three general conclusions stand out: (1) the federal government has multiple policy alternatives from which to choose, and reauthorized ESEA legislation need not merely replicate approaches from the past; (2) the challenge that educators and policymakers face at present involves "developing" rather than replicating successful strategies to improve low-performing schools; (3) states vary tremendously in terms of their strategies and capacity to improve low-performing schools. Consequently, the optimal federal-state relationship would entail flexibility and incorporate a range of policy levers. Each chapter contains footnotes. A bibliography is included. (Contains 1 table.) [This work was prepared for the Sandler Foundation.]
Abstractor:	As Provided
Reference Count:	0

Note:	N/A
Identifiers:	United States; Elementary Secondary Education Act; No Child Left Behind Act 2001
Record Type:	Non-Journal
Level:	N/A
Institutions:	RAND Education
Sponsors:	N/A
ISBN:	N/A
ISSN:	N/A
Audiences:	N/A
Languages:	English
Education Level:	Elementary Secondary Education
Direct Link:	http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR989.html

Back to Search Results