ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation
Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.


Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results    permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details - EJ866484
Title: First-Year Biology Students' Understandings of Meiosis: An Investigation Using a Structural Theoretical Framework

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:First-Year Biology Students' Understandings of Meiosis: An Investigation Using a Structural Theoretical Framework
Authors:Quinn, FrancesPegg, JohnPanizzon, Debra
Descriptors:BiologyScientific ConceptsScientific PrinciplesConcept FormationCollege ScienceScience InstructionForeign CountriesInterviewsCollege StudentsMisconceptionsGeneticsMolecular StructureClassification
Source:International Journal of Science Education, v31 n10 p1279-1305 Jul 2009
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Date:2009-07-00
Pages:27
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:Meiosis is a biological concept that is both complex and important for students to learn. This study aims to explore first-year biology students' explanations of the process of meiosis, using an explicit theoretical framework provided by the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) model. The research was based on responses of 334 first-year biology students to practical and examination questions about meiosis, together with student interviews. Students' written responses were coded, which resulted in a hierarchy of qualitatively different categories consistent with recent developments in the SOLO model. Most responses described a number of the less abstract elements of meiosis, but not in a coherent, relational manner, and interviews elucidated several areas of confusion about meiosis and its subordinate concepts. These findings are consistent with much previous research, and provide insights into both the use of the SOLO model as a research tool and students' understandings of meiosis. In conjunction with previous research, the results of this study raise questions beyond its local context about the match between students' apparent understandings and university expectations. The implications of the study relate to the use of terminology, the treatment of meiosis in textbooks, and some specific issues of pedagogy. (Contains 2 tables and 1 figure.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:49

Note:N/A
Identifiers:Australia
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0950-0693
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Higher Education
Direct Link:http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/09500690801914965
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский