ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation
Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.


Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results    permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details - EJ825223
Title: Deciding What Is a Controversial Issue: A Case Study of Social Studies Curriculum Controversy

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:Deciding What Is a Controversial Issue: A Case Study of Social Studies Curriculum Controversy
Authors:Camicia, Steven P.
Descriptors:Grade 6Social StudiesControversial Issues (Course Content)WarUnited States HistoryJapanese AmericansClassificationInterdisciplinary ApproachSocial Science ResearchStakeholdersCurriculum DevelopmentConflictTime Perspective
Source:Theory and Research in Social Education, v36 n4 p298-316 Fall 2008
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:College and University Faculty Assembly of NCSS. 8555 Sixteenth Street Suite 500, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Tel: 800-683-0812; Tel: 301-588-1800; Fax: 301-588-2049; Web site: http://www.socialstudies.org/cufa/trse/
Publication Date:2008-00-00
Pages:19
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:Frame analysis was used to examine how competing stakeholders framed a sixth grade curriculum controversy over whether the WWII internment of Japanese Americans should be categorized as a controversial issue. Teachers and administrators in a northwestern U.S. school claimed that the internment was clearly wrong and not controversial, but these claims were challenged by a small group of activists. Three data sets were analyzed: 11 semi-structured interviews, 40 public documents, and curriculum materials. Although activists could not change the school's claims, they were able to change the curriculum. Findings illustrate the ways that stakeholders in social studies curriculum controversies negotiate whether an issue should be categorized as controversial. Categorizations were dynamic and contingent on historical, contemporary, and ideological contexts. (Contains 1 note.)
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:42

Note:N/A
Identifiers:Structured Interviews
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0093-3104
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Grade 6
Direct Link:http://www.socialstudies.org/cufa/trse
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский