ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation
Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.


Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results    permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details - EJ820425
Title: Learning to Lead: What Gets Taught in Principal-Preparation Programs

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:Learning to Lead: What Gets Taught in Principal-Preparation Programs
Authors:Hess, Frederick M.Kelly, Andrew P.
Descriptors:Educational AdministrationEducational ChangeCourse DescriptionsInstructional LeadershipPrincipalsAdministrator EducationEducational ImprovementCurriculumProgram ContentContent AnalysisSchools of EducationAdministrator QualificationsSurveys
Source:Teachers College Record, v109 n1 p244-274 2007
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:Teachers College, Columbia University. P.O. Box 103, 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027. Tel: 212-678-3774; Fax: 212-678-6619; e-mail: tcr@tc.edu; Web site: http://www.tcrecord.org
Publication Date:2007-00-00
Pages:31
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:Background/Context: School leadership is the key to school improvement. In a new era of accountability, where school leaders are expected to demonstrate bottom-line results and use data to drive decisions, the skill and knowledge of principals matter more than ever. Meanwhile, public school choice, charter schooling, developments in teacher compensation and hiring, and site-based budgeting have created new opportunities for principal leadership. In this environment, school improvement rests to an unprecedented degree on school leaders. Purpose/Objective/Research question/Focus of study: Today, school principals are asked to lead in a new world marked by unprecedented responsibilities, challenges, and managerial opportunities. Are principal-preparation programs equipping their charges for this new role? Research design: We examined the content of instruction at a stratified sample of the nation's principal-preparation programs, including the programs training the most candidates, the programs regarded as the most prestigious, and more typical programs. Data collection and analysis: We surveyed 56 programs and collected at least four "core" course syllabi from 31 that met the standards permitting systematic coding for a total of 210 syllabi. The syllabi yielded 2,424 total course weeks. Findings/Results: Just 2 percent of 2,424 course weeks addressed accountability in the context of school management or school improvement, and less than 5 percent included instruction on managing school improvement via data, technology, or empirical research. Of 360 course weeks devoted to personnel management, just 12 weeks mentioned teacher dismissal and nine mentioned teacher compensation. Critics often assert that education schools are ideological. In fact, just 12 percent of all course weeks focused upon norms and values. In the norms-and-values lessons, however, there was strong evidence of normative bias in the topic descriptions and assigned readings. There was little attention to management thinkers from outside of the narrow field of educational administration. Of the 50 most influential living management thinkers, as determined by a 2003 survey of management professionals and scholars, just nine were assigned a total of 29 times in the 210 courses. Conclusions/Recommendations: The evidence raises questions about whether preparation is well-matched to the contemporary world of schooling, and whether graduates of principal-preparation programs are being equipped for the challenges and opportunities posed by an era of accountability. This study suggests new avenues for future research, including the degree to which syllabi actually reflect the content of instruction and what approaches to instruction or assessment are employed in the course of principal preparation.
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:0

Note:N/A
Identifiers:N/A
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-1467-9620
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Direct Link:http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=12742
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский