ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation
Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.


Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results    permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details - EJ817017
Title: "Men Are Dogs": Is The Stereotype Justified? Data On the Cheating College Male

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:"Men Are Dogs": Is The Stereotype Justified? Data On the Cheating College Male
Authors:Knox, DavidVail-Smith, KarenZusman, Marty
Descriptors:MalesSex StereotypesUndergraduate StudentsGender DifferencesSexualityEthicsDrinkingSexually Transmitted DiseasesInterpersonal Relationship
Source:College Student Journal, v42 n4 p1015-1022 Dec 2008
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:Project Innovation, Inc. P.O. Box 8508 Spring Hill Station, Mobile, AL 36689-0508. Tel: 251-343-1878; Fax: 251-343-1878; Web site: http://www.projectinnovation.biz/csj.html
Publication Date:2008-12-00
Pages:8
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Abstract:Analysis of data from 1394 undergraduates at a large southeastern university were used to assess the degree to which the stereotype that "men are dogs" (sexually-focused cheaters) is justified. Results suggest that this stereotype is unjustified since the majority of males: (1) define behaviors from kissing to anal sex as cheating; (2) predict that they will not cheat on their partners; and (3) report never having cheated on a partner. However, compared to those of the women, the frequencies with which men report cheating are high. Approximately one-in-five males in a "monogamous" relationship reported having had oral sex and/or vaginal intercourse with someone else (22.2% and 19.7% respectively) and withheld this information from their partners (thus leaving the partners vulnerable to STD/HIV infection). Implications and limitations of the study are identified.
Abstractor:As Provided
Reference Count:12

Note:N/A
Identifiers:United States (Southeast)
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0146-3934
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Higher Education
Direct Link:http://www.projectinnovation.biz/csj_2006.html
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский