ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation
Alert:
Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.


Help Help Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page

back Back to Search Results    permalink Help Help Permalink    Share this clipboard Share this record

Record Details - EJ751112
Title: Keeping Accountability Systems Accountable

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help Help | Help Movie Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's website

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:Keeping Accountability Systems Accountable
Authors:Foote, Martha
Descriptors:Federal LegislationState StandardsExit ExaminationsAccountabilityEducational QualityElementary Secondary EducationAcademic Achievement
Source:Phi Delta Kappan, v88 n5 p359-363 Jan 2007
More Info:
Help Help
Peer Reviewed:
Publisher:Phi Delta Kappa International. 408 North Union Street, P.O. Box 789, Bloomington, IN 47402-1789. Tel: 800-766-1156; Fax: 812-339-0018; e-mail: orders@pdkintl.org; Web site: http://www.pdkintl.org/publications/pubshome.htm
Publication Date:2007-01-00
Pages:5
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Abstract:The standards and accountability movement in education has undeniably transformed schooling throughout the United States. Even before President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act into law in January 2002, mandating annual public school testing in English and math for grades 3-8 and once in high school, most states had already instituted their own accountability systems of state standards linked to state exams. It is widely assumed that if students pass state tests that are aligned with state standards, their school is doing a good job of educating them, and if they pass the state's exit exam, they are ready to face the challenges of college. In this article, the author questions those assumptions and presents an alternative way of judging the quality of a student's high school education. (Contains 18 endnotes.)
Abstractor:ERIC
Reference Count:0

Note:N/A
Identifiers:NCLB; No Child Left Behind Act 2001; United States
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0031-7217
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Elementary Secondary Education
Direct Link:http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/ktoc.htm
 

back Back to Search Results



Notice of Language Assistance: English  |  español  |  中文: 繁體版  |  Việt-ngữ  |  한국어  |  Tagalog  |  Русский