Writing about Biology: How Rhetorical Choices Can Influence the Impact of a Scientific Paper.

Alert:

Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

Help

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help With This Page

More Info:
Help 0 items in My Clipboard | Add record to My Clipboard

Record Details - EJ607080

Title: Writing about Biology: How Rhetorical Choices Can Influence the Impact of a Scientific Paper.

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial Help Finding Full Text

Related Items: Show Related Items

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:	Writing about Biology: How Rhetorical Choices Can Influence the Impact of a Scientific Paper.
Authors:	Moore, Randy
Descriptors:	Higher Education; Research Reports; Rhetoric; Science History; Scientific and Technical Information; Scientific Methodology; Secondary Education; Writing Instruction; Writing Strategies
Source:	Bioscene, v26 n1 p23-25 Feb 2000
More Info: Help Peer Reviewed:
Publisher:	N/A
Publication Date:	2000-00-00
Pages:	N/A
Pub Types:	Guides - Classroom - Teacher; Journal Articles
Abstract:	Compares two landmark papers in biology to show how different rhetorical choices can influence the impact of a scientific paper. Argues that papers by Watson and Crick, and Avery, MacLeod and McCarty that present revolutionary biological findings provide an interesting and valuable case study for teaching students the importance of rhetoric and writing in science. (Contains 16 references.) (Author/WRM)
Abstractor:	N/A
Reference Count:	N/A

Note:	N/A
Identifiers:	N/A
Record Type:	Journal
Level:	N/A
Institutions:	N/A
Sponsors:	N/A
ISBN:	N/A
ISSN:	N/A
Audiences:	N/A
Languages:	English
Education Level:	Higher Education; Secondary Education