Disputation and Reframing: Contrasting Cognitive-Change Methods.

Alert:

Limited Availability of Full-Text Documents. Click here for more information, or here to request the return of a PDF online.

Help

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help |

Tutorial

Help With This Page

More Info:
Help 0 items in My Clipboard | Add record to My Clipboard

Record Details - EJ452543

Title: Disputation and Reframing: Contrasting Cognitive-Change Methods.

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial Help Finding Full Text | More Info:
Help Find in a Library

Related Items: Show Related Items

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
Title:	Disputation and Reframing: Contrasting Cognitive-Change Methods.
Authors:	Guterman, Jeffrey T.
Descriptors:	Cognitive Restructuring; Counseling Techniques; Counseling Theories; Family Counseling; Models; Rational Emotive Therapy
Source:	Journal of Mental Health Counseling, v14 n4 p440-56 Oct 1992
More Info: Help Peer Reviewed:	Yes
Publisher:	N/A
Publication Date:	1992-00-00
Pages:	N/A
Pub Types:	Journal Articles; Opinion Papers
Abstract:	Examines Russell and Morrill's proposal to integrate rational-emotive therapy (RET) and systemic family therapy by combining RET's disputation and Mental Research Institute's reframing. Contrasts RET's disputation and Mental Research Institute's reframing across key clinical issues. Suggests that models combining these schools' techniques be conceptualized in accord with framework of selective eclecticism, rather than integration. (Author/NB)
Abstractor:	N/A
Reference Count:	0

Note:	N/A
Identifiers:	Systemic Family Therapy
Record Type:	Journal
Level:	N/A
Institutions:	N/A
Sponsors:	N/A
ISBN:	N/A
ISSN:	ISSN-1040-2861
Audiences:	N/A
Languages:	English
Education Level:	N/A