ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation

ED399878 - Who Is Responsible for Graduate Student Attrition--The Individual or the Institution? Toward an Explanation of the High and Persistent Rate of Attrition.

Help Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page
Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

PDF ERIC Full Text (343K)

Related Items: Show Related Items
Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:ED399878
Title:Who Is Responsible for Graduate Student Attrition--The Individual or the Institution? Toward an Explanation of the High and Persistent Rate of Attrition.
Authors:Lovitts, Barbara E.
Descriptors:Academic PersistenceEducational InnovationEducational PhilosophyEnrollment ManagementGraduate StudentsGraduate StudyHigher EducationSchool Holding PowerStudent AttritionTheory Practice Relationship
Source:N/A
More Info:
Help
Peer-Reviewed:
N/A
Publisher:N/A
Publication Date:1996-04-09
Pages:22
Pub Types:Speeches/Meeting Papers; Opinion Papers; Information Analyses
Abstract:Graduate schools have responded to the problem of graduate student attrition by placing greater emphasis on selection, assuming that better, more informed admission decisions would result in declining attrition. Yet the problem persists, and the question arises as to whether attrition is due to individual characteristics of graduate students or to factors inherent in the structure and process of graduate education. This paper argues that attrition has less to do with what students bring to the university than with what happens to them after they have been admitted. It develops a social-structural explanation for persistent high attrition rates and why graduate schools have not developed effective solutions by bringing together attribution theory from social psychology (Jones & Nisbet, 1971; Ross, 1978); exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect theory from political economy (Hirschman, 1970); and the theory of greedy institutions from sociology (Coser, 1974). Graduate schools need to focus on the social forces which lead to atomism and pluralistic ignorance among students, forces which divide and isolate them from each other and from faculty, and which stifle voice and allow students to exit in silence. (Contains 24 references.) (Author/MAH)
Abstractor:N/A
Reference Count:N/A

Note:Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New York, NY, April 9, 1996).
Identifiers:University of Maryland College Park
Record Type:Non-Journal
Level:1 - Available on microfiche
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:N/A
Audiences:N/A
Languages:English
Education Level:Higher Education
 

ERIC Home